ArticleOphthalmology science2023
Reduced Electroretinogram Responses in Morphologically Normal Retina in Patients with Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Infant primary hyperoxaluria type 1Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe ocular findings in individuals with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), focusing on the correlations between retinal anatomy and retinal function. To characterize the retinal alterations that occur at different disease stages by evaluating individuals with diverse degrees of renal impairment associated with PH1. Design: A cross-sectional study. Participants: Patients diagnosed with PH1 based on clinical criteria and genetic testing, treated in the Pediatric Nephrology Unit of the Ruth Children's Hospital, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel between 2013 and 2021. Methods: The ophthalmological assessment included a slit-lamp biomicroscopy of the anterior and posterior segment or indirect ophthalmoscopy. Electroretinography was employed for assessment of the retinal function, and retinal imaging included spectral-domain OCT and fundus autofluorescence. A systematic evaluation of the disease stage was based on clinical criteria including physical examination, purposeful imaging (X-ray, echocardiography, and US abdomen), and laboratory tests as needed. Main Outcome Measures: Anatomical and functional assessment of the retina in patients with PH1, and the relationship between retinal dysfunction and kidney impairment. Results: A total of 16 eyes were examined in the study of 8 children ranging in age from 4 to 19 years. Four eyes (25%) showed normal structural and functional retinal findings, 8 eyes (50%) presented functional impairment in the absence of pathological structural findings, and 4 eyes (25%) had advanced retinal damage that manifested as significant morphological and functional impairment. There was no direct relationship between the severity of the renal disease and the severity of the retinal phenotype. Conclusions: Subjects with PH1 present varying severity levels of the retinal phenotype, with possible discrepancy between the clinical retinal morphology and the retinal function noted on electroretinography. These findings raise questions about the molecular basis of the retinal manifestations in PH1. The presence of functional impairment in the absence of evident crystal deposition in the retina suggests that, in addition to oxalate crystal accumulation, other biomolecular processes may play a role in the development of retinopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.