ArticleCureus2023
Evaluation of Salivary Pepsin Levels and Dental Erosion in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Buffer Capacity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Relationship Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and Dental Erosion in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Salivary pH and buffering capacity among gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with dental erosion.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Evaluation of salivary pH and buffering capacity in gastroesophageal reflux among patients with dental erosion.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal condition affecting many individuals worldwide. GERD is characterized by esophageal symptoms and may contribute to various extraesophageal symptoms, including dental erosion (DE). This study aimed to estimate the levels of pepsin in the saliva of GERD patients to evaluate and compare the activity of pepsin between the GERD and healthy groups and investigate the prevalence of DE in the GERD group. Methodology In this case-control study, 40 patients with GERD, diagnosed with an endoscope, and 35 healthy subjects were included. Patients and healthy individuals were subjected to the GERD questionnaire (GerdQ). A dental assessment was performed using the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE). A total score of the BEWE risk level was obtained by summing the scores obtained in each sextant (no risk = ≤2, low risk = 3-8, medium risk = 9-13, and high risk = >13). Five milliliters of unstimulated saliva were collected in a sterile tube. The salivary pepsin levels examined using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were recorded for both groups. Results DE was significantly more frequent in GERD patients compared to healthy subjects. Overall, 32 (80%) GERD patients and 11 (31.4%) healthy individuals had DE risk. The mean salivary pepsin was 43.60 ± 10.61 ng/mL in the GERD group and 20.60 ± 9.27 ng/mL in the healthy group. A statistically significant difference was found in pepsin levels between the two groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions The study concluded that GERD patients had a higher prevalence of DE than healthy individuals. Our findings suggest that elevated salivary pepsin levels and their role as a factor responsible for DE need further evaluation to understand the mechanisms of pepsin-mediated damage leading to DE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.