ArticleCureus2023
Acute Pulmonary Edema After Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment: A Case Report Written With ChatGPT Assistance.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications and Concerns of ChatGPT and Other Conversational Large Language Models in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Application of large language models in oral health education: a review of the literature.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2025Review
- HBOT-induced noncardiogenic pulmonary edema in acute carbon monoxide poisoning: A case report and mechanistic insights.Medicine · 2025Article
- Unveiling the risks of ChatGPT in diagnostic surgical pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Applications and Future Prospects of Medical LLMs: A Survey Based on the M-KAT Conceptual Framework.Journal of medical systems · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of ChatGPT and Other Conversational Large Language Models in Healthcare.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Exploring the Role of ChatGPT in Cardiology: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Learning to Fake It: Limited Responses and Fabricated References Provided by ChatGPT for Medical Questions.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Article
- Review
- Large Language Models in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- ChatGPT in medical writing: A game-changer or a gimmick?Perspectives in clinical researchReview
- Artificial intelligence at the pen's edge: Exploring the ethical quagmires in using artificial intelligence models like ChatGPT for assisted writing in biomedical research.Perspectives in clinical researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pulmonary edema is a rare but severe complication of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. While patients with known cardiovascular problems may be able to withstand this therapy, rapid decompensation can still occur. Here, we present a case of a patient with known low ejection fraction and severe mitral regurgitation who developed acute pulmonary edema during the first hyperbaric treatment for a foot ulcer. This case highlights the importance of identifying patients that are high risk, such as those with moderate-to-severe cardiac disease, and pursuing other treatment options to avoid this complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.