Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36909062›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Continuous Infusion Versus Bolus Injection of Loop Diuretics for Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.

Jithin Karedath, Anim Asif, Niharika Tentu, Tafseer Zahra, Saima Batool, Meenakshi Sathish, Qudsia I Sandhu, Areeba Khan

Registry-linked trialFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07464249 (Comparison of the Effectiveness of Bolus and Infusion Diuretic Therapy in the Management of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07464249 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Bolus and Infusion Diuretic Therapy in the Management of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments: a Randomised, Double-blind Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyRan2024 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsAcute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)ArmsFurosemide Bolus, Furosemide Continuous İnfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jithin KaredathInternal Medicine, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, GBR.
Anim AsifMedicine, Fauji Foundation, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Niharika TentuInternal Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Tafseer ZahraMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Saima BatoolInternal Medicine, Hameed Latif Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Meenakshi SathishSurgery, Caribbean Medical University School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Qudsia I SandhuMedicine, Dera Ghazi Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan, PAK.
Areeba KhanCritical Care Medicine, United Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loop diuretics continue to be a crucial component of pharmacological treatment, to eliminate extra fluid and enhance symptom control in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Understanding the loop diuretics' more efficient form of administration would be very beneficial in improving the management of people's ADHF, resulting in a quicker resolution of symptoms and a notable decrease in morbidity. To assess the outcomes of intravenous continuous infusion with bolus injection of loop diuretics for patients with ADHF, this meta-analysis was carried out. The current meta-analysis was conducted as per the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was carried out on PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies comparing continuous infusion with intermittent bolus injection of furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure without restriction on the language of publication from 1 January 2001 to 31 July 2022. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was all-cause mortality and loss of body weight (kg). Pre-defined secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS) in days, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) reduction (pg/ml), number of patients with hypokalemia, and urine output at 24 hours (ml). A total of nine articles were included in this meta-analysis enrolling 713 patients. No significant difference was reported between patients who received intermittent bolus injections and continuous infusion of furosemide in regards to all-cause mortality, LOS, total urine output, the incidence of hypokalemia, and change in BNP. However, the reduction of body weight was greater in the continuous infusion group compared to bolus administration. In conclusion, in the current meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs), continuous infusion of furosemide seemed to have a greater reduction of body weight. However, no significant difference was there in 24-hrs urine output. However, we cannot conclude that intravenous continuous infusion has a better diuretic effect compared to bolus administration.

Indexed as

acute decompensated heart failurebolus administrationcontinuous infusionfurosemideloop diuretic

Identifiers

PMID36909062
PMCPMC10005852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read37
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.