ArticleCureus2023
How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Viewer Engagement Patterns in Advanced Procedural and Patient-Facing Orthopedic YouTube Videos: A Seven-Year Single-Channel Cross-Sectional Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction YouTube is one of the top-searched online video streaming platforms. However, the content of YouTube may not match the standards required for clinical skills learning. Therefore, we investigated the quality of top-viewed YouTube videos related to three basic surgical procedures that need to be performed by general surgery residents in their first year of training in our institute. Methods We searched YouTube for the top 10 viewed demonstration videos related to ultrasound-guided abscess drainage, chest tube insertion, and central line insertion. For the eligible videos, we calculated the likes ratio, view ratio, and video power index. The videos' quality was assessed using LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) scores. The videos were categorized into high-quality (LAP-VEGaS score ≥ 11) and low-quality videos (LAP-VEGaS score < 11). The different descriptive (view counts, duration, and likes-dislikes) and calculated parameters stated above were compared between the two video quality-based groups. Results The selected videos were uploaded between July 2008 and March 2022. Their mean view counts were 460391.13±373760.19. Their mean video duration was 8.12±4.26 minutes. Their mean likes and dislikes were 2578.38±2977.43 and 144.10±129.80, respectively. The mean like ratio and the mean view ratio were 93.42±13.53 and 317.76±827.79, respectively. The mean video power index was 310.67±827.96. The mean LAP-VEGaS scores for ultrasound-guided abscess drainage, chest tube insertion, and central line insertion-related videos were 6.80, 11.10, and 11.20, respectively. The numbers of likes and dislikes were significantly higher for high-quality videos. Conversely, the view counts, the view ratio, and the video power index were significantly lower for high-quality videos. Conclusion Top-viewed videos related to general surgery procedural demonstrations are of low quality. The video view counts, popularity, and likes-dislikes are highly unreliable indicators of surgical video's usefulness. There is a need for regulatory mechanisms to screen the YouTube content suitable for general surgery residents learning. The residents should therefore be cautious while making inferences based on YouTube videos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.