ArticleCureus2023
A Study on Acute Myocardial Infarction and Its Prognostic Predictors.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of relative hand grip strength with myocardial infarction and angina pectoris in the Korean population: a large-scale cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for predicting post-discharge mortality risk in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- A diagnostic prediction model for the early detection of heart failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Hydrogel Cardiac Patch for Infarct Regeneration Based on Natural Polysaccharides.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is a serious cardiac event characterized by the sudden death of heart muscle tissue due to the obstruction of blood flow to the heart. It is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The relationship between AMI and serum uric acid levels is an area of ongoing research. Serum uric acid is a byproduct of purine metabolism and is typically present in the blood at low levels. Elevated levels of uric acid have been linked to several cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. This has led to the investigation of the relationship between uric acid levels and AMI. Materials and Methods In this study, 100 individuals who were presented with acute myocardial infarction were included. All patients were categorized into four Killip's classes based on history, clinical examination, and lab investigation. Subsequently, the four Killip's classes were co-related with the serum uric acid of the patient. Results Serum uric acid levels were high in males compared to females. serum uric acid levels were high in Killip's class III (7.24) and IV (7.57) compared to class I (4.48) and II (5.26). There was no significant correlation between serum uric acid and the co-morbidities like diabetes and hypertension, with a p-value of 0.48. Conclusion An increase in Killip Class is positively correlated with an increase in blood uric acid levels. Uric acid can therefore be utilized as a prognostic indicator in individuals who present with myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.