Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908966›Full record

ArticleChemical science2023

Atomic-scale observation of solvent reorganization influencing photoinduced structural dynamics in a copper complex photosensitizer.

Tetsuo Katayama, Tae-Kyu Choi, Dmitry Khakhulin, Asmus O Dohn, Christopher J Milne, György Vankó, Zoltán Németh, Frederico A Lima, Jakub Szlachetko, Tokushi Sato and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tetsuo KatayamaJapan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute Kouto 1-1-1, Sayo Hyogo 679-5198 Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-8316
Tae-Kyu ChoiXFEL Division, Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Jigok-ro 127-80 Pohang 37673 Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-9165
Dmitry KhakhulinEuropean XFEL Holzkoppel 4, Schenefeld 22869 Germany.
Asmus O DohnScience Institute, University of Iceland 107 Reykjavík Iceland giale@hi.is.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-7168
Christopher J MilneEuropean XFEL Holzkoppel 4, Schenefeld 22869 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4714-9139
György VankóWigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-1525 Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3095-6551
Zoltán NémethWigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-1525 Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4399-1890
Frederico A LimaEuropean XFEL Holzkoppel 4, Schenefeld 22869 Germany.
Jakub SzlachetkoSOLARIS National Synchrotron Radiation Centre, Jagiellonian University PL-30392 Kraków Poland.
Tokushi SatoEuropean XFEL Holzkoppel 4, Schenefeld 22869 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3155-3487
Shunsuke NozawaInstitute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) 1-1 Oho Tsukuba Ibaraki 305-0801 Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-6849
Shin-Ichi AdachiInstitute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) 1-1 Oho Tsukuba Ibaraki 305-0801 Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-1165
Makina YabashiRIKEN SPring-8 Center 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo Hyogo 679-5148 Japan tetsuo@spring8.or.jp.
Thomas J PenfoldChemistry-School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University Newcastle Upon-Tyne NE1 7RU UK.
Wojciech GaweldaDepartamento de Química, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus Cantoblanco 28047 Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-9197
Gianluca LeviScience Institute, University of Iceland 107 Reykjavík Iceland giale@hi.is.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-0653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photochemical reactions in solution are governed by a complex interplay between transient intramolecular electronic and nuclear structural changes and accompanying solvent rearrangements. State-of-the-art time-resolved X-ray solution scattering has emerged in the last decade as a powerful technique to observe solute and solvent motions in real time. However, disentangling solute and solvent dynamics and how they mutually influence each other remains challenging. Here, we simultaneously measure femtosecond X-ray emission and scattering to track both the intramolecular and solvation structural dynamics following photoexcitation of a solvated copper photosensitizer. Quantitative analysis assisted by molecular dynamics simulations reveals a two-step ligand flattening strongly coupled to the solvent reorganization, which conventional optical methods could not discern. First, a ballistic flattening triggers coherent motions of surrounding acetonitrile molecules. In turn, the approach of acetonitrile molecules to the copper atom mediates the decay of intramolecular coherent vibrations and induces a further ligand flattening. These direct structural insights reveal that photoinduced solute and solvent motions can be intimately intertwined, explaining how the key initial steps of light harvesting are affected by the solvent on the atomic time and length scale. Ultimately, this work takes a step forward in understanding the microscopic mechanisms of the bidirectional influence between transient solvent reorganization and photoinduced solute structural dynamics.

Identifiers

PMID36908966
PMCPMC9993854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.