Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908864›Full record

ArticleMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2023

Nationwide Survey on the Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RA) for the Management of Immune Thrombocytopenia in Current Clinical Practice in Italy.

Mariasanta Napolitano, Nicola Vianelli, Lisanna Ghiotto, Silvia Cantoni, Giuseppe Carli, Monica Carpenedo, Valentina Carrai, Ugo Consoli, Gaetano Giuffrida, Elisa Lucchini and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mariasanta Napolitano *Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Reference Regional Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Hematology Unit, Palermo.
Nicola Vianelli *Institute of Hematology "Seràgnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna, Bologna.
Lisanna GhiottoHematology Project Foundation, Vicenza, affiliated to Department of Hematology, "S. Bortolo" Hospital, Vicenza.
Silvia CantoniDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST "Grande Ospedale Metropolitano," Niguarda Hospital, Milan.
Giuseppe CarliDepartment of Hematology, "S. Bortolo" Hospital, Vicenza.
Monica CarpenedoHematology and Transplantation Unit, "S. Gerardo" Hospital, Monza.
Valentina CarraiHematology Unit, A.O.U. "Careggi", Florence.
Ugo ConsoliDivision of Hematology, ARNAS Garibaldi, Catania.
Gaetano GiuffridaDivision of Hematology, AOU "Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania.
Elisa LucchiniHematology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste.
Elena RossiSection of Hematology, Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome.
Cristina SantoroHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Rome.
Francesco RodeghieroHematology Project Foundation, Vicenza, affiliated to Department of Hematology, "S. Bortolo" Hospital, Vicenza.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Two thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are currently widely adopted as second-line ITP therapy even in the absence of robust evidence on their comparative advantages over rituximab or splenectomy or their preferential use in some specific clinical contexts. Methods: An online survey was distributed between May 2021 and June 2021 to collect standardized information on TPO-RA use in Italy. Results: Eighty-eight hematologists from 79 centers completed the survey. Eighty-four percent would use TPO-RA earlier than formally indicated, without a preference for young or elderly in 82% of respondents. No clear preference for either romiplostim or eltrombopag was indicated. Seventy-two percent would use TPO-RA in young patients aiming at a complete response followed by tapering, a strategy considered by only 16% in the elderly. Switching between the two agents was considered appropriate in case of insufficient response or intolerance. Tapering schedule by reducing the dosage and prolonging the intervals between administrations was preferred by 73% of respondents. TPO-RA was considered a risk factor for thrombosis by only 35%, and 94% would administer TPO-RA in elderly patients also in the presence of other thrombotic risk factors. Thirty-three percent of respondents would withdraw TPO-RA in case of thrombosis. The TPORA administration has been reported to be preferred over anti-CD20 or splenectomy by about half of the participants due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Significant discrepancies in TPO-RA use emerged from the survey, and participants would appreciate consensus-based specific guidance on the practical use of TPO-RA.

Indexed as

thrombocytopeniaTPO-RA

Identifiers

PMID36908864
PMCPMC10000838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.