ReviewPeerJ2023
Review in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extraction, Identification, and Preliminary Investigation of the Antihypertensive Mechanism of ACE-Inhibitory Peptides fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Conservation-Oriented Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temporal Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Reprogramming Unveils a Two-Phase Salt Tolerance Mechanism inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Conservation Genomics ofEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Optimal Extraction of Antioxidants, Flavonoids, and Phenolic Acids from the Leaves ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Response of Anatomical Structure and Active Component Accumulation inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Harnessing the microbial interactions fromSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of element and metabolite content between the seeds ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Multiscale responses to combined drought and salinity stress inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Suitable Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Various Tissues ofGenes · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.