ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Ascertaining the optimal myoelectric signal recording duration for pattern recognition based prostheses control.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electromyogram-based pattern recognition (EMG-PR) has been widely considered an essentially intuitive control method for multifunctional upper limb prostheses. A crucial aspect of the scheme is the EMG signal recording duration (SRD) from which requisite motor tasks are characterized per time, impacting the system's overall performance. For instance, lengthy SRD inevitably introduces fatigue (that alters the muscle contraction patterns of specific limb motions) and may incur high computational costs in building the motion intent decoder, resulting in inadequate prosthetic control and controller delay in practical usage. Conversely, relatively shorter SRD may lead to reduced data collection durations that, among other advantages, allow for more convenient prosthesis recalibration protocols. Therefore, determining the optimal SRD required to characterize limb motion intents adequately that will aid intuitive PR-based control remains an open research question. Method: This study systematically investigated the impact and generalizability of varying lengths of myoelectric SRD on the characterization of multiple classes of finger gestures. The investigation involved characterizing fifteen classes of finger gestures performed by eight normally limb subjects using various groups of EMG SRD including 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 s. Two different training strategies including Between SRD and Within-SRD were implemented across three popular machine learning classifiers and three time-domain features to investigate the impact of SRD on EMG-PR motion intent decoder. Result: The between-SRD strategy results which is a reflection of the practical scenario showed that an SRD greater than 5 s but less than or equal to 10 s (>5 and < = 10 s) would be required to achieve decent average finger gesture decoding accuracy for all feature-classifier combinations. Notably, lengthier SRD would incur more acquisition and implementation time and vice-versa. In inclusion, the study's findings provide insight and guidance into selecting appropriate SRD that would aid inadequate characterization of multiple classes of limb motion tasks in PR-based control schemes for multifunctional prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.