Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908770›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Efficacy of emicizumab is maintained throughout dosing intervals for bleed prophylaxis.

Steven W Pipe, Ben Trzaskoma, Miranda Minhas, Michaela Lehle, Richard H Ko, Ling Gao, Johnny Mahlangu, Christine L Kempton, Craig M Kessler, Rebecca Kruse-Jarres

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Contemporary approaches to treat people with hemophilia: what's new and what's not?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The imperative to prevent joint bleeding in everyone living with hemophilia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Steven W PipeDepartments of Pediatrics and Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ben TrzaskomaUS Medical Affairs, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Miranda MinhasUS Medical Affairs, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Michaela LehleProduct Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Richard H KoUS Medical Affairs, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Ling GaoAnalystat Corporation, Point Roberts, Washington, USA.
Johnny MahlanguDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Christine L KemptonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology and Hemophilia of Georgia Center for Bleeding & Clotting Disorders of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Craig M KesslerThe Division of Coagulation, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Rebecca Kruse-JarresDivision of Hematology, University of Washington and Washington Center for Bleeding Disorders, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Emory University · USGeorgetown University · USNational Health Laboratory Service · ZARoche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Across the HAVEN clinical trial program, the efficacy of emicizumab has been demonstrated in children, adolescents, and adults with hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors. After the 4-week loading dose period, emicizumab concentrations are expected to remain at levels that provide bleed protection throughout the entire dosing interval, regardless of the chosen maintenance dosing regimen, ie, weekly, every 2 weeks, or every 4 weeks. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the timing of treated bleeds within the dosing intervals for emicizumab administered during the HAVEN 1 to 4 studies. Methods: In this post hoc analysis, we pooled data from all the participants of the HAVEN 1 to 4 studies and analyzed the timing of treated bleeds in relation to the emicizumab dose. Results: A total of 392 participants were included in this analysis, with a median (range) age of 28.0 years (1.1-77.0 years). Target joints were identified in 237 of 392 (60.5%) participants before the study entry. Overall, 211 of 392 (53.8%) participants experienced 907 treated bleeding events. The total mean (SD) annualized bleeding rate across the 4 studies was 1.6 (5.9). There was no evidence that bleeding events clustered on any 1 particular day in any dosing schedule from HAVEN 1 to 4 ( Conclusion: Data from the HAVEN 1 to 4 trials show consistent bleed prevention within the dosing interval, regardless of the dosing regimen chosen. These findings provide further evidence of the sustained efficacy of emicizumab across all approved dosing regimens to reduce bleeding in people with hemophilia A.

Indexed as

bispecific antibodydrug administration scheduleemicizumabhemophilia Aprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID36908770
PMCPMC9992752
OpenAlexW4319335155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.