Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908769›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Bleeding phenotype in nonsevere hemophilia by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool, bleeding frequency, and the joint status.

Judit Rejtő, Daniel Kraemmer, Ella Grilz, Oliver Königsbrügge, Cornelia Gabler, Gerhard Schuster, Clemens Feistritzer, Raute Sunder-Plaßmann, Peter Quehenberger, Cihan Ay and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The imperative to prevent joint bleeding in everyone living with hemophilia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Judit RejtőDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel KraemmerDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ella GrilzDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Oliver KönigsbrüggeDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cornelia GablerIT Systems and Communications, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard SchusterRed Cross Blood Service Linz, Linz, Austria.
Clemens FeistritzerDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Haematology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Raute Sunder-PlaßmannDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter QuehenbergerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cihan AyDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ingrid PabingerDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johanna GebhartDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the phenotype of severe hemophilia has been well studied, there are still knowledge gaps in nonsevere hemophilia. Objectives: The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical bleeding phenotype in nonsevere hemophilia and its association with different factor VIII/IX assessments. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study to investigate the bleeding phenotype in adults with nonsevere hemophilia by the number of bleeding and joint bleeding in the past 5 years, a joint score, and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool (ISTH-BAT). Factor levels were analyzed by 1-stage (lowest in history and at study inclusion) and chromogenic assay (at study inclusion). Patients were enrolled between March 2015 and May 2019. Results: Of the 111 patients (86 with mild and 25 with moderate hemophilia), 57 patients (54.8%) reported any bleeding and 24 (23.1%) any joint bleeding in the past 5 years. A joint score ≥1 was found in 44 patients (41.9%), an ISTH-BAT ≥4 in 100 patients (90.1%), and an ISTH-BAT joint item ≥1 in 50 patients (45.0%). Within the ISTH-BAT, muscle and joint bleeds showed the largest difference between mild and moderate hemophilia. The lowest factor VIII/IX level in patients' history was best associated with bleeding outcomes. Factor was inversely associated with joint bleeds (incidence rate ratio 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98), joint score, and ISTH-BAT (odds ratios from proportional odds ordinal logistic regression 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97; and 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.93, respectively). Conclusion: The occurrence of joint bleeding differentiated persons with mild and moderate hemophilia. The ISTH-BAT and lowest factor in patients' history provided valuable information of the bleeding phenotype in nonsevere hemophilia.

Indexed as

bleedingfactor IXfactor VIIIhemophiliaphenotype

Identifiers

PMID36908769
PMCPMC9999231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.