ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023
Measurement of extended half-life recombinant FVIII molecules:
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laboratory Challenges in the Era of Novel Haemophilia Therapies.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Monitoring Extended Half-Life Factor VIII and IX Concentrates: Performance in Routine Clotting-and Thrombin Generation Assays.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extended half-life recombinant FVIII products (EHL-rFVIIIs) have been engineered to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of FVIII, enabling better hemostatic protection with a reduced number of injections in persons with hemophilia. Previous studies showed several discrepancies in FVIII activity (FVIII:C) measurements for EHL-rFVIIIs comparing one-stage clotting assay (OSA) and chromogenic assay (CSA), although a systematic investigation of this phenomenon is still lacking. Objective: Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of measurement of all available EHL-rFVIIIs with 5 different assays both Methods: Damoctocog alfa pegol, rurioctocog alfa pegol, turoctocog alfa pegol, and efmoroctocog alfa were tested with 3 OSA types: (1) aPTT-based commercial reagents with colloidal silica (Synthasil, Werfen-IL); (2) ellagic acid, Synthafax (Werfen-IL); and (3) OSA calibrated with each EHL-rFVIII product and colloidal silica. Measurements were also carried out with 2 different commercially available CSA reagents (Coamatic Factor VIII, Chromogenix-Werfen) and Trinichrom FVIII (Tcoag-Stago). A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to compare all assays. Results: The simple OSA showed significant discrepancies between the expected and measured EHL-rFVIII concentrations as CSA methods, whereas the calibrated OSA assay was accurate and precise in determining the activity of all EHL-rFVIIIs in the Conclusion: In this study, only OSA with a calibration curve constructed with each EHL-rFVIII product showed acceptable accuracy and precision in EHL-rFVIIIs measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.