Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908747›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2023

Guidelines: The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources.

Faran Khalid, Michael Wu, Daniel K Ting, Brent Thoma, Mary R C Haas, Michael J Brenner, Yusuf Yilmaz, Young-Min Kim, Teresa M Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Faran KhalidMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5410-1729
Michael WuMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-5876
Daniel K TingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-8326
Brent ThomaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-5786
Mary R C HaasDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School, US.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-5928
Michael J BrennerDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery University of Michigan Medical School, US.ORCID 0000-0003-4926-0957
Yusuf YilmazMcMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) program & Office of Continuing Professional Development Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-4418
Young-Min KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8765-7109
Teresa M ChanMcMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept of Medicine, Division of Emergency, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-6104-462X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In medical education, there is a growing global demand for Open Educational Resources (OERs). However, OER creators are challenged by a lack of uniform standards. In this guideline, the authors curated the literature on how to produce OERs for medical education with practical guidance on the Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows for OER creation in order to improve the impact and quality of OERs in medical education. Methods: We conducted a rapid literature review by searching OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central database using keywords "open educational resources" and "OER". The search was supplemented by hand searching the identified articles' references. We organized included articles by theme and extracted relevant content. Lastly, we developed recommendations via an iterative process of peer review and discussion: evidence-based best practices were designated Do's and Don'ts while gaps were designated Don't Knows. We used a consensus process to quantify evidentiary strength. Results: The authors performed full text analysis of 81 eligible studies. A total of 15 Do's, Don't, and Don't Knows guidelines were compiled and presented alongside relevant evidence about OERs. Discussion: OERs can add value for medical educators and their learners, both as tools for expanding teaching opportunities and for promoting medical education scholarship. This summary should guide OER creators in producing high-quality resources and pursuing future research where best practices are lacking.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID36908747
PMCPMC9997113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.