ArticleFrontiers in health services2022
Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performing lifestyle changes and reducing stroke risk: a process evaluation of a stroke prevention intervention.BMJ open · 2026Trial
- Using co-design to develop actionable strategies to identify and follow-up on breast cancer survivors in primary care.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Adapting, Sustaining and Scaling Violence against Women and Children Prevention Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review on the Use of Implementation Science.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2026Article
- Five years of the Implementation Research Logic Model: a citation analysis and systematic scoping review of its use in implementation research and practice.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Review
- One size does not fit all: Understanding child safety through context, power, and co-creation.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Development of blueprint materials that strengthen and embed the infection control link nurse role in hospitals - an action research study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Method to engage invested partners to co-create feasible and sustainable approaches to design and implement cancer prevention and control tools.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- The development of national learning collaborative for ePRO enabled RSM in oncology: insights for co-implementation.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Community engagement and implementation science: a hermeneutic review for implementation scientists.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Eyewitness testimony by individuals who stammer: Evidence, experience and perceived credibility.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
- Bridging research and practice for dementia care: strategies and challenges of public and private funders in the dissemination and implementation of dementia research.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Article
- Adapting a resistance training program for Danish physical education: teachers' preconceptions and participatory co-adaptation.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- What does it take to support community-engaged research in an academic medical center? A mixed-methods study of community and academic perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Navigating qualitative methods choices in dissemination and implementation research.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Illustrating Key Components to Co-Creation Through Preventive Care mHealth Messaging with Underserved Communities and Expert Partners.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Advancing knowledge, maps and tools to address obesity and related socio-economic disparities in Europe: the OBCT project.Global health action · 2025Article
- Your project or our project? Evaluating the participatory development of an adolescent healthy sleep intervention.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Using the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model assessment to enhance the implementation of electronic screening in military to Veterans Affairs programs.Psychological services · 2025Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cultural humility and the integration of multiple perspectives and values among organizations, groups, and individuals. However, the IS field lacks guidance for researchers on structuring collaborative approaches to promote a co-created process (i.e., synergistic approach to goal attainment). We contend that improved operationalization of co-created implementation collaborations is critical to sparking synergy and addressing differentials based on power, privilege, knowledge, and access to resources among stakeholders. These differentials can undermine future implementation and sustainment efforts if not addressed early in the research effort. An insufficient understanding of the guiding principles of co-created implementation collaborations may limit the scientific value of evaluation processes, and researchers' ability to replicate outcomes. We propose a perspective foregrounded in the concept of co-creation to guide the structuring of implementation collaboratives through five principles. We offer three case examples informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to illustrate the application of these co-creation principles. Lastly, we offer recommendations for promoting co-creation in IS research moving forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.