Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908682›Full record

ArticleMethods in ecology and evolution2022

Principled, practical, flexible, fast: a new approach to phylogenetic factor analysis.

Gabriel W Hassler, Brigida Gallone, Leandro Aristide, William L Allen, Max R Tolkoff, Andrew J Holbrook, Guy Baele, Philippe Lemey, Marc A Suchard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Scalable Generative Modeling of Weighted Graphs.Transactions on machine learning research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-response phylogenetic mixed models: concepts and application.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Leveraging graphical model techniques to study evolution on phylogenetic networks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Modeling the velocity of evolving lineages and predicting dispersal patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Data integration in Bayesian phylogenetics.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Gabriel W HasslerDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Brigida GalloneVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium.
Leandro AristideEcole Normale Superieure Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris, France.
William L AllenDepartment of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Max R TolkoffDepartment of Biostatistics, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Andrew J HolbrookDepartment of Biostatistics, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Guy BaeleDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Philippe LemeyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marc A SuchardDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
University of California, Los Angeles · USRega Institute for Medical Research · BEInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESSwansea University · GBVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology · BE

Funding

Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
Statistical Innovation to Integrate Sequences and Phenotypes for Scalable Phylodynamic InferenceR01AI153044 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Marc A. Suchard · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
Big Data Predictive Phylogenetics with Bayesian LearningK25AI153816 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HOLBROOK, ANDREW JAMES · 2020 to 2024
$532k
Scalable Inference in Statistical Models of Viral Evolution and Human HealthF31AI154824 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HASSLER, GABRIEL WILLIAM · 2021 to 2022
$64k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536NIAID NIH HHS F31 AI154824NIAID NIH HHS K25 AI153816NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI153044Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological phenotypes are products of complex evolutionary processes in which selective forces influence multiple biological trait measurements in unknown ways. Phylogenetic comparative methods seek to disentangle these relationships across the evolutionary history of a group of organisms. Unfortunately, most existing methods fail to accommodate high-dimensional data with dozens or even thousands of observations per taxon. Phylogenetic factor analysis offers a solution to the challenge of dimensionality. However, scientists seeking to employ this modeling framework confront numerous modeling and implementation decisions, the details of which pose computational and replicability challenges.We develop new inference techniques that increase both the computational efficiency and modeling flexibility of phylogenetic factor analysis. To facilitate adoption of these new methods, we present a practical analysis plan that guides researchers through the web of complex modeling decisions. We codify this analysis plan in an automated pipeline that distills the potentially overwhelming array of decisions into a small handful of (typically binary) choices.We demonstrate the utility of these methods and analysis plan in four real-world problems of varying scales. Specifically, we study floral phenotype and pollination in columbines, domestication in industrial yeast, life history in mammals, and brain morphology in New World monkeys.General and impactful community employment of these methods requires a data scientific analysis plan that balances flexibility, speed and ease of use, while minimizing model and algorithm tuning. Even in the presence of non-trivial phylogenetic model constraints, we show that one may analytically address latent factor uncertainty in a way that (a) aids model flexibility, (b) accelerates computation (by as much as 500-fold) and (c) decreases required tuning. These efforts coalesce to create an accessible Bayesian approach to high-dimensional phylogenetic comparative methods on large trees.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceBEASTGeodesic Hamiltonian Monte Carlolatent factor modelphylogenetic comparative methodsStiefel manifold

Identifiers

PMID36908682
PMCPMC9997680
OpenAlexW3179905153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.