Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908681›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2023

Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach.

Jessica Gemignani, Irene de la Cruz-Pavía, Anna Martinez, Caroline Nallet, Alessia Pasquini, Gaia Lucarini, Francesca Cavicchiolo, Judit Gervain

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica GemignaniUniversity of Padua, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7722-4489
Irene de la Cruz-PavíaUniversity of the Basque Country, Department of Linguistics and Basque Studies, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3425-0596
Anna MartinezUniversity of Padua, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-8171
Caroline NalletUniversity of Padua, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8968-3762
Alessia PasquiniUniversity of Padua, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Padua, Italy.
Gaia LucariniUniversity of Padua, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-1051
Francesca CavicchioloUniversity of Padua, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Padua, Italy.
Judit GervainUniversity of Padua, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Concerns about the reproducibility of experimental findings have recently emerged in many disciplines, from psychology to medicine and neuroscience. As NIRS is a relatively recent brain imaging technique, the question of reproducibility has not yet been systematically addressed. Aim: The current study seeks to test the replicability of effects observed in NIRS experiments assessing young infants' rule-learning ability. Approach: We conducted meta-analyses and mixed-effects modeling-based inferential statistics to determine whether effect sizes were replicable and comparable in a sample of 23 NIRS studies investigating infants' abilities to process repetition- and diversity-based regularities in linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory and visual sequences. Additionally, we tested whether effect sizes were modulated by different factors such as the age of participants or the laboratory. We obtained NIRS data from 12 published and 11 unpublished studies. The 23 studies involved a total of 487 infants, aged between 0 and 9 months, tested in four different countries (Canada, France, Italy, and USA). Results: Our most important finding is that study and laboratory were never significant moderators of variation in effect sizes, indicating that results replicated reliably across the different studies and labs included in the sample. We observed small-to-moderate effect sizes, similar to effect sizes found with other neuroimaging and behavioral techniques in the developmental literature. In line with existing findings, effect sizes were modulated by the participants' age and differed across the different regularities tested, with repetition-based regularities giving rise to the strongest effects; in particular, the overall magnitude of this effect in the left temporal region was 0.27 when analyzing the entire dataset. Conclusions: Meta-analysis is a useful tool for assessing replicability and cross-study variability. Here, we have shown that infant NIRS studies in the language domain replicate robustly across various NIRS machines, testing sites, and developmental populations.

Indexed as

infant NIRS datameta-analysisreplication crisisrule learning

Identifiers

PMID36908681
PMCPMC9997722
OpenAlexW4323537830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.