Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908680›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2023

Using preregistration as a tool for transparent fNIRS study design.

Philipp A Schroeder, Christina Artemenko, Jessica E Kosie, Helena Cockx, Katharina Stute, João Pereira, Franziska Klein, David M A Mehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philipp A SchroederUniversity of Tuebingen, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-6086
Christina ArtemenkoUniversity of Tuebingen, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-7960
Jessica E KosiePrinceton University, Social and Natural Sciences, Department of Psychology, Princeton, New Jersey, United States.
Helena CockxRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Biophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7782-7178
Katharina StuteChemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Chemnitz, Germany.
João PereiraUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-1904
Franziska KleinUniversity of Oldenburg, Department of Psychology, Neurocognition and functional Neurorehabilitation Group, Oldenburg (Oldb), Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9752-5203
David M A MehlerRWTH Aachen University, Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-2617

Funding

Neural and behavioral coordination in infant-caregiver communication across the socioeconomic spectrumF32HD103439 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KOSIE, JESSICA ELIZABETH · 2021 to 2023
$176k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD103439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: The expansion of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) methodology and analysis tools gives rise to various design and analytical decisions that researchers have to make. Several recent efforts have developed guidelines for preprocessing, analyzing, and reporting practices. For the planning stage of fNIRS studies, similar guidance is desirable. Study preregistration helps researchers to transparently document study protocols before conducting the study, including materials, methods, and analyses, and thus, others to verify, understand, and reproduce a study. Preregistration can thus serve as a useful tool for transparent, careful, and comprehensive fNIRS study design. Aim: We aim to create a guide on the design and analysis steps involved in fNIRS studies and to provide a preregistration template specified for fNIRS studies. Approach: The presented preregistration guide has a strong focus on fNIRS specific requirements, and the associated template provides examples based on continuous-wave (CW) fNIRS studies conducted in humans. These can, however, be extended to other types of fNIRS studies. Results: On a step-by-step basis, we walk the fNIRS user through key methodological and analysis-related aspects central to a comprehensive fNIRS study design. These include items specific to the design of CW, task-based fNIRS studies, but also sections that are of general importance, including an in-depth elaboration on sample size planning. Conclusions: Our guide introduces these open science tools to the fNIRS community, providing researchers with an overview of key design aspects and specification recommendations for comprehensive study planning. As such it can be used as a template to preregister fNIRS studies or merely as a tool for transparent fNIRS study design.

Indexed as

functional near-infrared spectroscopyguideopen sciencepreregistrationstudy designtemplate

Identifiers

PMID36908680
PMCPMC9993433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.