Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908673›Full record

ArticleJACC. Basic to translational science2023

Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing of Drugs: Part 1: Off-Label Use-Patient Harms and Prescriber Responsibilities.

Gail A Van Norman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Panitumumab-Based EGFR Blockade in SMARCB1-Deficient Renal Medullary Carcinoma: Preclinical Basis and Prospective Clinical Activity.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Development of tenecteplase for stroke thrombolysis: Japan's endeavor.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Expanding Role of Omalizumab: From Food Allergy to Drug Desensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Off-label Prescribing of Clozapine and Safety.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gail A Van NormanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Once medical drugs and devices are approved for marketing by the FDA they can legally be used for purposes and in ways other than the ones for which they have been tested and approved. However, it is illegal for manufacturers to advertise or promote such unapproved uses of the drugs and devices. Part 1 of this review focuses on off-label use of FDA-approved therapies. Part 2 addresses illegal off-label marketing of drugs and devices. While off-label use can be beneficial to patients, unless carefully undertaken off label use may undermine the important safety mission of the FDA, can expose patients to elevated risks without proven benefits (or possibly no benefit), and can reduce motivation of companies to study the safety and risks of off-label use of therapies. These problems are further amplified when off-label use occurs among very vulnerable patient populations such as the elderly, patients with mental health disorders, pregnant women and pediatric patients. This review considers ethical issues in off-label use, as well as important steps for physicians considering an off-label prescription of a drug or device.

Indexed as

drugs and device marketingethicsFDA, Food and Drug Administrationoff label marketingoff label use

Identifiers

PMID36908673
PMCPMC9998554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.