Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908667›Full record

ReviewJACC. Basic to translational science2023

Mechanisms of the "No-Reflow" Phenomenon After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Potential Role of Pericytes.

Sanjiv Kaul, Carmen Methner, Zhiping Cao, Anusha Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pericytes in mouse heart.Frontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nonmyocytes as electrophysiological contributors to cardiac excitation and conduction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanjiv KaulKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Carmen MethnerKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Zhiping CaoKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Anusha MishraKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericytes contract during myocardial ischemia resulting in capillary constriction and no reflow. Reversing pericyte contraction pharmacologically reduces no reflow and infarct size. These findings open up an entire new venue of research aimed at altering pericyte function in myocardial ischemia and infarction.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionblood flowCHP, capillary hydrostatic pressureMBF, myocardial blood flowMCE, myocardial contrast echocardiographynecrosisNG2, neural glial antigen-2no reflowpericytes

Identifiers

PMID36908667
PMCPMC9998747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.