Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908589›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Comparison of a direct aspiration first pass technique vs. stent retriever thrombectomy for the treatment of acute large vessel occlusion stroke in the anterior circulation with atrial fibrillation.

Hongxing Fan, Zhenhui Li, Yi Li, Yanping Tan, Zhenlin Mao, Qian Liu, Youfeng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influencing factors of futile recanalization after endovascular intervention in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongxing FanDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenhui LiDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanping TanDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenlin MaoDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Qian LiuDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Youfeng ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) and a direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) are the two main mechanical thrombectomy (MT) techniques for acute ischemic stroke. Few data are available for comparing the therapeutic effects associated with the two mechanical thrombectomy techniques in acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of both techniques for the treatment of acute large vessel occlusion stroke in the anterior circulation with atrial fibrillation. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022 who received mechanical thrombectomy by either SRT or ADAPT. Comparisons were made with regards to the initial traits, course of therapy, effectiveness indicators, and complications of these individuals. The primary outcome is recanalization rate. Results: In this study, after screening 431 patients, 92 eligible patients, with 48 patients received SRT and 44 patients received ADAPT, were included. There was no significant difference in the recanalization rate between the two groups (SRT 87.5% vs. ADAPT 84.1%, Conclusions: Compared with SRT, ADAPT has similar recanalization rate for the treatment of acute large vessel occlusion stroke in the anterior circulation with atrial fibrillation. However, ADAPT might be more effective in terms of shorter puncture to recanalization time and higher first pass success recanalization rate. Further studies are needed for confirming our results.

Indexed as

acute large vessel occlusion strokea direct aspiration first pass techniqueatrial fibrillationmechanical thrombectomystent retriever thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID36908589
PMCPMC9998705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.