ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
From the national to the local: Issues of trust and a model for community-academic-engagement.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of trust in engaging community-based task forces and agencies among minoritized communities during a public health emergency.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Health System Community Partnership to Design an Online Resource to Address Perinatal Information Needs for Black Families: Action Research Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Building capacity, driving impact: A landscape analysis of community engagement and outreach cores' activities.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Centering What Matters: Aligning Action with Individual and Community Health Goals: Commission on Investment Imperatives for a Healthy Nation.NAM perspectives · 2026Review
- Sustained Community Involvement in Translational Research: Evaluating the Acceptability of a Multisession Community Engagement Studio Approach.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Equity-grounded implementation science: Comparative case analysis of three studies.Psychological services · 2025Article
- Social accountability in medical school curricula in Punjab, Pakistan: a qualitative analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Towards anti-racist futures: a scoping review exploring educational interventions that address systemic racism in post graduate medical education.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025Article
- Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust, Mistrust, and Distrust: Implications for Advancing Health Equity and Building Trustworthiness.Annual review of public health · 2024Review
- The promise and challenges of multi-cancer early detection assays for reducing cancer disparities.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Reimagining the approach for advancing maternal health equity through authentic patient engagement and research practices.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- "Do they REALLY trust us"?: Lessons from a volunteer research registry.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- A novel approach to research engagement: Developing a targeted theory of change with Black and African-American stakeholders.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Building healthy populations one community at a time.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Using Community-Partnered Participatory Research to Value the "Community Lens" and Promote Equity in Community-Academic Partnerships.Health equity · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inequities in health and health care in the United States have persisted for decades, and the impacts on equity from the COVID-19 pandemic were no exception. In addition to the disproportionate burden of the disease across various populations, the pandemic posed several challenges, which exacerbated these existing inequities. This has undoubtedly contributed to deeply rooted public mistrust in medical research and healthcare delivery, particularly among historically and structurally oppressed populations. In the summer of 2020, given the series of social injustices posed by the pandemic and highly publicized incidents of police brutality, notably the murder of George Floyd, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) enlisted the help of a national collaborative, the AAMC Collaborative for Health Equity: Act, Research, Generate Evidence (CHARGE) to establish a three-way partnership that would gather and prioritize community perspectives and lived experiences from multiple regions across the US on the role of academic medicals centers (AMCs) in advancing health and social justice. Given physical gathering constraints posed by the pandemic, virtual interviews were conducted with 30 racially and ethnically diverse community members across the country who expressed their views on how medical education, clinical care, and research could or did impact their health experiences. These interviews were framed within the context of the relationship between historically oppressed groups and the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials underway. From the three-way partnership formed with the AAMC, AAMC CHARGE participants, and 30 community members from racially and ethnically diverse groups, qualitative methods provided lived experiences supporting other literature on the lack of trust between oppressed communities and AMCs. This led to the development of the Principles of Trustworthiness (PoT) Toolkit, which features ten principles inspired by community members' insights into how AMCs can demonstrate they are worthy of their community's trust. In the end, the three-way partnership serves as a successful model for other national medical and health organizations to establish community engaged processes that elicit and prioritize lived experiences describing relationships between AMCs and oppressed communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.