ReviewFrontiers in public health2023
Cell and gene therapy regulatory, pricing, and reimbursement framework: With a focus on South Korea and the EU.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global Panoramic analysis of clinical research in cell therapy: clinical trial landscape, marketed products, and regulatory trends.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Outcomes of Tisagenlecleucel Versus Standard-of-Care Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis From Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) - An analysis of the global regulatory status.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pathing the way from regulatory approval to market access for gene therapy products (GTPs): An integrative review in the US, EU5, Japan and China.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Price determinants and pricing policies concerning potentially innovative health technologies: a scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Advances in Cell and Gene Therapy for Rare Disease Treatment.International journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Barriers and Solutions Towards Integrating Orthobiologics into Clinical Orthopaedic Practice.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Challenges for gene therapy in the financial sustainability of health systems: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Fetal gene therapy.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2024Review
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the mechanism of action, and other considerations for cell-based therapy candidates.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Editorial: Advances in stem cell therapy: new applications and innovative therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ever since relevant bioengineering technologies have sufficiently matured to the platformizable commercialization stage, a slew of money has flocked to the cell and gene therapy market over the last few years, resulting in an abundance of clinical studies in the field. Newer modalities have brought up a string of regulatory and legislative tasks, such as developing guidelines and legislative rules to systematically regulate newer pharmaceutical products. Accordingly, another layer of legislation and guidelines tailored for cell and gene therapies has been introduced and is expected to evolve on par with technological progress. Furthermore, authorities have shifted to pricing and reimbursement policies that can share risks for cost and outcome among stakeholders altogether, such as developers and the government, while expanding the accessibility of patients to innovative cell and gene therapies. This review attempts to capture the salient regulatory features of the cell and gene therapy market in the context of South Korea and the European Union and points out where two sovereign entities currently stand on each policy element and how each tackles regulatory challenges. We can observe the converging trend where regulatory, pricing and reimbursement rules of adjoining countries in the supranational union or member countries of a consortium are getting more aligned. Evidently, concerted efforts to share regulatory science knowledge and embrace reference pricing have played their parts. The authors argue that policy priorities should be placed on initiatives to harmonize with other medical authorities to better the rights of patients and clear out the uncertainties of developers, ultimately to share and advance regulatory science and layout forward-looking policies at opportune times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.