Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908437›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Changes in the health literacy of residents aged 15-69 years in central China: A three-round cross-sectional study.

Xin Mei, Gong Chen, Yuting Zuo, Qian Wu, Junlin Li, Yilin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin MeiWuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Gong ChenMedical Department, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuting ZuoWuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Qian WuWuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Junlin LiWuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Yilin LiWuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Health literacy is an effective strategy to promote more cost-effective use of health care services and a crucial tool for preventing the spread of infectious diseases. The main objective of this study was to analyze changes in health literacy from 2019 to 2021. Methods: Data were from the latest three-round cross-sectional studies with the same study design. Results: Although the prevalence of adequate health literacy rose significantly over time, increasing from 26.9% (95% CI 20.1-33.7) in 2019 to 34.1% (32.9-35.3) in 2021, it was still at a relatively low level. The most significant decrease was observed for health skills among the three aspects and health information literacy among the six dimensions. Working as medical staff was a protective factor for adequate health literacy, health skills literacy, and health information literacy. Risk factors for adequate health literacy and health information literacy were older age and lower education level. Furthermore, adequate health information literacy was positively related to annual family income. Discussion: More practical and effective policies targeting health literacy for critical aspects and groups in Central China, are urgently needed, especially during the epidemic.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaireschanging trendCOVID-19healthcarehealth literacyprevalence

Identifiers

PMID36908437
PMCPMC9998942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.