Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908412›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Monitoring residues of pesticides in food in Brazil: A multiscale analysis of the main contaminants, dietary cancer risk estimative and mechanisms associated.

Juliana Maria Bitencourt de Morais Valentim, Tatiane Renata Fagundes, Mariane Okamoto Ferreira, Pâmela Lonardoni Micheletti, Geise Ellen Broto Oliveira, Milena Cremer Souza, Beatriz Geovana Leite Vacario, Janaína Carla da Silva, Thalita Basso Scandolara, Shaiane Carla Gaboardi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Utilization ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Juliana Maria Bitencourt de Morais ValentimDepartment of Pathological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Brazil.
Tatiane Renata FagundesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Jacarezinho, Brazil.
Mariane Okamoto FerreiraCenter of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Blumenau, Brazil.
Pâmela Lonardoni MichelettiCenter of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Blumenau, Brazil.
Geise Ellen Broto OliveiraCenter of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Blumenau, Brazil.
Milena Cremer SouzaDepartment of Pathological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Brazil.
Beatriz Geovana Leite VacarioDepartment of Pathological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Brazil.
Janaína Carla da SilvaUniversité de Montréal (UdeM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Thalita Basso ScandolaraInstituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Shaiane Carla GaboardiCenter of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Blumenau, Brazil.
Luciano Zanetti Pessoa CandiottoCenter of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Blumenau, Brazil.
Juliana Mara SerpeloniDepartment of Pathological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Brazil.
Fábio Rodrigues Ferreira SeivaDepartment of Pathological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Brazil.
Carolina PanisDepartment of Pathological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pesticides pose a risk for cancer development and progression. People are continuously exposed to such substances by several routes, including daily intake of contaminated food and water, especially in countries that are highly pesticide consumers and have very permissive legislation about pesticide contamination as Brazil. This work investigated the relationship among pesticides, food contamination, and dietary cancer risk. Methods: Analyzed two social reports from the Brazilian Government: the Program for Analysis of Residues of Pesticides in Food (PARA) and The National Program for Control of Waste and Contaminants (PNCRC). Results and discussion: First, we characterized the main pesticide residues detected over the maximum limits allowed by legislation or those prohibited for use in food samples analyzed across the country. Based on this list, we estimated the dietary cancer risks for some of the selected pesticides. Finally, we searched for data about dietary cancer risks and carcinogenic mechanisms of each pesticide. We also provided a critical analysis concerning the pesticide scenario in Brazil, aiming to discuss the food contamination levels observed from a geographical, political, and public health perspective. Exposures to pesticides in Brazil violate a range of human rights when food and water for human consumption are contaminated.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPesticide ResiduesPesticidesBrazilDietHumansRisk AssessmentPesticide ResiduesPesticidesBrazilcancer riskenvironmental exposurefood intakepesticide

Identifiers

PMID36908412
PMCPMC9992878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.