ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2022
Differentiating tubercular from pyogenic causes of spine involvement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recommendations of the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2025 on Spinal Infections: Part B Tubercular Spondylodiscitis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Differentiating Tuberculous and Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: Part II: MRI/CT Features, Prediction Models, and the Role of PET/CT-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A comprehensive analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and laboratory features in pyogenic, tuberculous, brucellar, and fungal spondylitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Validation of a clinical scoring system to differentiate mycobacterial and bacterial causes of spondylodiscitis: a retrospective cohort study from Kerala, India.Le infezioni in medicina · 2025Article
- Hematologic Inflammation Indices for Differentiating between Brucella, Pyogenic, and Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Imaging of Spondylodiscitis: A Comprehensive Updated Review-Multimodality Imaging Findings, Differential Diagnosis, and Specific Microorganisms Detection.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Differentiation of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Comprehensive Review of Imaging Techniques and Future Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
- Clinical and epidemiological aspects of spondylodiscitis in a tertiary care hospital in South India.Le infezioni in medicina · 2024Article
- Cervical Spinal Epidural Abscess: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes: A Case Series and a Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Based on clinical parameters alone, it is difficult to differentiate between tubercular (TB) and pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Therefore, this study aimed to identify imaging features that can help to differentiate these two entities. Methodology: This retrospective observational study included microbiologically confirmed cases of TB and pyogenic spondylitis over three years. Magnetic resonance imaging of included cases was reviewed for a predefined set of imaging findings. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to compare the radiological features of both groups. A scoring system was created using the features that were significant in univariate and multivariable analysis. Results: Of the 90 included cases, 44 were TB and 46 were pyogenic. Involvement of the thoracic vertebra, paravertebral abscess, epidural abscess, posterior element involvement, loss of height, spine deformity, nerve compression, destruction of the disc and larger abscess size were more common in patients with TB. Involvement of the thoracic spine, posterior element involvement and spine deformity were independent predictors of diagnosing TB spine. At a score of 7 (out of 11) or above, the scoring system had a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 94%, respectively, in diagnosing the TB spine. Conclusion: In the presence of relevant clinical findings, specific MRI findings can help to differentiate TB from pyogenic spondylitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.