Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36908269›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2023

Systems-based digital twins to help characterize clinical dose-response and propose predictive biomarkers in a Phase I study of bispecific antibody, mosunetuzumab, in NHL.

Monica E Susilo, Chi-Chung Li, Kapil Gadkar, Genevive Hernandez, Ling-Yuh Huw, Jin Y Jin, Shen Yin, Michael C Wei, Saroja Ramanujan, Iraj Hosseini

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Digital twins: a call for an under-developed tool in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. What Is a Digital Twin in QSP, and Are We Doing It Right?CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Mining the gaps: Deciphering Alzheimer's biology through AI-driven reconciliation.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bispecific Antibodies in Hematologic Malignancies: Attacking the Frontline.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  20. Computational modelling of aggressive B-cell lymphoma.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Monica E SusiloGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Chi-Chung LiGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9590-3450
Kapil GadkarGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Genevive HernandezGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Ling-Yuh HuwGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Jin Y JinGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Shen YinGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael C WeiGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Saroja RamanujanGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Iraj HosseiniGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase I oncology clinical trials often comprise a limited number of patients representing different disease subtypes who are divided into cohorts receiving treatment(s) at different dosing levels and schedules. Here, we leverage a previously developed quantitative systems pharmacology model of the anti-CD20/CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, mosunetuzumab, to account for different dosing regimens and patient heterogeneity in the phase I study to inform clinical dose/exposure-response relationships and to identify biological determinants of clinical response. We developed a novel workflow to generate digital twins for each patient, which together form a virtual population (VPOP) that represented variability in biological, pharmacological, and tumor-related parameters from the phase I trial. Simulations based on the VPOP predict that an increase in mosunetuzumab exposure increases the proportion of digital twins with at least a 50% reduction in tumor size by day 42. Simulations also predict a left-shift of the exposure-response in patients diagnosed with indolent compared to aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) subtype; this increased sensitivity in indolent NHL was attributed to the lower inferred values of tumor proliferation rate and baseline T-cell infiltration in the corresponding digital twins. Notably, the inferred digital twin parameters from clinical responders and nonresponders show that the potential biological difference that can influence response include tumor parameters (tumor size, proliferation rate, and baseline T-cell infiltration) and parameters defining the effect of mosunetuzumab on T-cell activation and B-cell killing. Finally, the model simulations suggest intratumor expansion of pre-existing T-cells, rather than an influx of systemically expanded T-cells, underlies the antitumor activity of mosunetuzumab.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLymphoma, Non-HodgkinBiomarkersB-LymphocytesHumansT-LymphocytesAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36908269
PMCPMC10339700
OpenAlexW4324017666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.