Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36907944›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2023

Multivariate analysis of PET pharmacokinetic parameters improves inferential efficiency.

Granville J Matheson, R Todd Ogden

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Granville J MathesonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA. granville.matheson@nyspi.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5646-4547
R Todd OgdenDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Funding

Suicidal Behavior: Aggression Subtypes, Childhood Adversity and Stress ResponseP50MH090964 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI OCHSNER, KEVIN N · 2013 to 2022
$23.6M
Advanced Modeling Techniques for Brain Imaging Data with PETR01EB024526 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI OGDEN, TODD · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024526NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH090964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn positron emission tomography quantification, multiple pharmacokinetic parameters are typically estimated from each time activity curve. Conventionally all but the parameter of interest are discarded before performing subsequent statistical analysis. However, we assert that these discarded parameters also contain relevant information which can be exploited to improve the precision and power of statistical analyses on the parameter of interest. Properly taking this into account can thereby draw more informative conclusions without collecting more data.

methodsBy applying a hierarchical multifactor multivariate Bayesian approach, all estimated parameters from all regions can be analysed at once. We refer to this method as Parameters undergoing Multivariate Bayesian Analysis (PuMBA). We simulated patient-control studies with different radioligands, varying sample sizes and measurement error to explore its performance, comparing the precision, statistical power, false positive rate and bias of estimated group differences relative to univariate analysis methods.

resultsWe show that PuMBA improves the statistical power for all examined applications relative to univariate methods without increasing the false positive rate. PuMBA improves the precision of effect size estimation, and reduces the variation of these estimates between simulated samples. Furthermore, we show that PuMBA yields performance improvements even in the presence of substantial measurement error. Remarkably, owing to its ability to leverage information shared between pharmacokinetic parameters, PuMBA even shows greater power than conventional univariate analysis of the true binding values from which the parameters were simulated. Across all applications, PuMBA exhibited a small degree of bias in the estimated outcomes; however, this was small relative to the variation in estimated outcomes between simulated datasets.

conclusionPuMBA improves the precision and power of statistical analysis of PET data without requiring the collection of additional measurements. This makes it possible to study new research questions in both new and previously collected data. PuMBA therefore holds great promise for the field of PET imaging.

Indexed as

Bayesian statisticsPharmacokinetic modellingPositron emission tomographyPowerPrecision

Identifiers

PMID36907944
PMCPMC10008760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read25
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.