Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36907884›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2023

Pericytes protect rats and mice from sepsis-induced injuries by maintaining vascular reactivity and barrier function: implication of miRNAs and microvesicles.

Zi-Sen Zhang, Yi-Yan Liu, Shuang-Shuang He, Dai-Qin Bao, Hong-Chen Wang, Jie Zhang, Xiao-Yong Peng, Jia-Tao Zang, Yu Zhu, Yue Wu and 3 more

Open access · diamondFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RelJournal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zi-Sen ZhangState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Yi-Yan LiuState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Shuang-Shuang HeState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Dai-Qin BaoState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Hong-Chen WangState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Jie ZhangState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Xiao-Yong PengState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Jia-Tao ZangState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Yu ZhuState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Yue WuState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Qing-Hui LiState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Tao LiState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China. lt200132@tmmu.edu.cn.
Liang-Ming LiuState Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Shock and Transfusion, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China. lmliu62@tmmu.edu.cn.
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular hyporeactivity and leakage are key pathophysiologic features that produce multi-organ damage upon sepsis. We hypothesized that pericytes, a group of pluripotent cells that maintain vascular integrity and tension, are protective against sepsis via regulating vascular reactivity and permeability.

methodsWe conducted a series of in vivo experiments using wild-type (WT), platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR-β)-Cre + mT/mG transgenic mice and Tie2-Cre + Cx43

resultsCLP and LPS induced severe injury/loss of pericytes, vascular hyporeactivity and leakage (P < 0.05). Transplantation with exogenous pericytes protected vascular reactivity and barrier function via microvessel colonization (P < 0.05). Cx43 knockout in either pericytes or VECs reduced pericyte colonization in microvessels (P < 0.05). Additionally, PCMVs transferred miR-145 and miR-132 to VSMCs and VECs, respectively, exerting a protective effect on vascular reactivity and barrier function after sepsis (P < 0.05). miR-145 primarily improved the contractile response of VSMCs by activating the sphingosine kinase 2 (Sphk2)/sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR)1/phosphorylation of myosin light chain 20 pathway, whereas miR-132 effectively improved the barrier function of VECs by activating the Sphk2/S1PR2/zonula occludens-1 and vascular endothelial-cadherin pathways.

conclusionsPericytes are protective against sepsis through regulating vascular reactivity and barrier function. Possible mechanisms include both direct colonization of microvasculature and secretion of PCMVs.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsSepsisAnimalsCapillary PermeabilityConnexin 43Endothelial CellsLipopolysaccharidesMicePericytesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyConnexin 43LipopolysaccharidesMicroRNAsMIRN145 microRNA, ratCx43MicrovesiclePericyteVascular permeabilityVascular reactivity

Identifiers

PMID36907884
PMCPMC10010010
OpenAlexW4324020378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read67
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.