Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36907747›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2023

The Influence of Social Determinants on Cancer Screening in a Medicaid Sample.

Anne R Markus, Yixuan Li, Marceé E Wilder, Jillian Catalanotti, Melissa L McCarthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Completion of Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Screening at a Community Health Center.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne R MarkusDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: armarkus@gwu.edu.
Yixuan LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Marceé E WilderThe Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jillian CatalanottiThe Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Melissa L McCarthyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

Integrating Social Determinants of Health Into Risk Adjustment Models: An Opportunity to Improve Care Coordination Strategies For Medicaid BeneficiariesR01MD011607 · NIMHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MCCARTHY, MELISSA L · 2017 to 2020
$2.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLittle attention has been paid to the influence of individually measured social determinants of health on cancer screening tests in the Medicaid population.

methodsAnalysis was conducted on 2015-2020 claims data from a subgroup of Medicaid enrollees from the District of Columbia Medicaid Cohort Study (N=8,943) who were eligible for colorectal (n=2,131), breast (n=1,156), and cervical cancer (n= 5,068) screening. Participants were grouped into four distinct social determinants of health groups on the basis of their responses to social determinants of health questionnaire. This study estimated the influence of the four social determinants of health groups on the receipt of each screening test using log-binomial regression adjusted for demographics, illness severity, and neighborhood-level deprivation.

resultsThe receipt of cancer screening tests was 42%, 58%, and 66% for colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer, respectively. Those in the most disadvantaged social determinants of health group were less likely to receive a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy than those in the least disadvantaged one (adjusted RR=0.70, 95% CI=0.54, 0.92). The pattern for mammograms and Pap smears was similar (adjusted RR=0.94, 95% CI=0.80, 1.11 and adjusted RR=0.90, 95% CI=0.81, 1.00, respectively). In contrast, participants in the most disadvantaged social determinants of health group were more likely to receive fecal occult blood test than those in the least disadvantaged one (adjusted RR=1.52, 95% CI=1.09, 2.12).

conclusionsSevere social determinants of health measured at the individual level are associated with lower cancer preventive screening. A targeted approach that addresses the social and economic adversities that affect cancer screening could result in higher preventive screening rates in this Medicaid population.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMedicaidCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningOccult BloodSocial Determinants of HealthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36907747
PMCPMC10293088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.