Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36907570›Full record

ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2023

Overview of Asian clinical practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An Asian perspective comparison.

Yuri Cho, Bo Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparing of Efficacy and Safety Between Sintilimab Plus IBI305 and PD-1 Inhibitor Plus TKIs in Combination of TACE for uHCC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuri ChoCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Bo Hyun KimCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Joong-Won ParkCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly prevalent and the third most common cause of cancer-related death in Asia. In contrast to the West, the main etiology of HCC in many Asian countries except Japan is chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Differences in the major causes of HCC lead to significant clinical and treatment differences. This review summarizes and compares guidelines on managing HCC from China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea. From oncology and socio-economic perspectives, factors such as underlying diseases, staging methods, government policies, insurance coverage, and medical resources contribute to varying treatment strategies among countries. Furthermore, the differences in each guideline are fundamentally caused by the lack of incontrovertible medical evidence, and even existing results of clinical trials can be interpreted differently. This review will provide a complete overview of the current Asian guidelines for HCC in recommendations and in practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatitis B, ChronicLiver NeoplasmsAsiaHumansTaiwanAsiaChronic hepatitis BHepatocellular carcinomaPractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID36907570
PMCPMC10121305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.