Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36907170›Full record

ReviewAnnals of coloproctology2023

The imitation game: a review of the use of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy, and endoscopists' perceptions thereof.

Sarah Tham, Frederick H Koh, Jasmine Ladlad, Koy-Min Chue, Cui-Li Lin, Eng-Kiong Teo, Fung-Joon Foo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah ThamDepartment of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth Services, Singapore.
Frederick H KohColorectal Service, Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth Services, Singapore.
Jasmine LadladColorectal Service, Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth Services, Singapore.
Koy-Min ChueDepartment of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth Services, Singapore.
Cui-Li LinSKH Endoscopy Centre, Division of Hyperacute Care, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth Services, Singapore.
Eng-Kiong TeoSKH Endoscopy Centre, Division of Hyperacute Care, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth Services, Singapore.
Fung-Joon FooColorectal Service, Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth Services, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of deep learning systems in artificial intelligence (AI) has enabled advances in endoscopy, and AI-aided colonoscopy has recently been ushered into clinical practice as a clinical decision-support tool. This has enabled real-time AI-aided detection of polyps with a higher sensitivity than the average endoscopist, and evidence to support its use has been promising thus far. This review article provides a summary of currently published data relating to AI-aided colonoscopy, discusses current clinical applications, and introduces ongoing research directions. We also explore endoscopists' perceptions and attitudes toward the use of this technology, and discuss factors influencing its uptake in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdenomaArtificial intelligenceBiodmedical technology assessmentColonic polypsColonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36907170
PMCPMC10626328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.