ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
EMG-informed neuromuscular model assesses the effects of varied bodyweight support on muscles during overground walking.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-cost Devices for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Review of Approaches, Designs, and Evidence.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Review
- The association between healthy walking and COVID-19 symptom severity: A cross-sectional study on the first peak following China's prevention policy change.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bodyweight supported walking is a common gait rehabilitation method that can be used as an experimental approach to better understand walking biomechanics. Neuromuscular modeling can provide an analytical means to gain insight into how muscles coordinate to produce walking and other movements. To better understand how muscle length and velocity affect muscle force during overground walking with bodyweight support, we used an electromyography (EMG)-informed neuromuscular model to investigate changes in muscle parameters (muscle force, activation and fiber length) at varying bodyweight support levels: 0%, 24%, 45% and 69% bodyweight. Coupled constant force springs provided a vertical support force while we collected biomechanical data (EMG, motion capture and ground reaction forces) from healthy, neurologically intact participants walking at 1.20 ± 0.06 m/s. The lateral and medial gastrocnemius demonstrated a significant decrease in muscle force (lateral: p = 0.002 and medial: p < 0.001) and activation (lateral: p = 0.007 and medial: p < 0.001) through push-off at higher levels of support. The soleus, in contrast, had no significant change in muscle activation through push-off (p = 0.652) regardless of bodyweight support level even though soleus muscle force decreased with increasing support (p < 0.001). During push-off, the soleus had shorter muscle fiber lengths and faster shortening velocities as bodyweight support levels increased. These results provide insight into how muscle force can be decoupled from effective bodyweight during bodyweight supported walking due to changes in muscle fiber dynamics. The findings contribute evidence that clinicians and biomechanists should not expect a reduction in muscle activation and force when using bodyweight support to assist gait during rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.