ArticleMedical physics2023
Combining physics-based models with deep learning image synthesis and uncertainty in intraoperative cone-beam CT of the brain.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review with a structured analysis of applications across subspecialties.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Real-time volumetric CBCT reconstruction using surface and X-ray imaging for image-guided radiotherapy.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Digital twins and Big AI: the future of truly individualised healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the robustness of deep learning models trained to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using a retrospective study.Medical physics · 2025Article
- CBCT-to-CT synthesis using a hybrid U-Net diffusion model based on transformers and information bottleneck theory.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Uncertainty estimation in female pelvic synthetic computed tomography generated from iterative reconstructed cone-beam computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical Super-Resolution Computed Tomography of Bone Microstructure: Application in Musculoskeletal and Dental Imaging.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Intraoperative Imaging and Optical Visualization Techniques for Brain Tumor Resection: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImage-guided neurosurgery requires high localization and registration accuracy to enable effective treatment and avoid complications. However, accurate neuronavigation based on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) or computed tomography (CT) images is challenged by brain deformation occurring during the surgical intervention. PURPOSE: To facilitate intraoperative visualization of brain tissues and deformable registration with preoperative images, a 3D deep learning (DL) reconstruction framework (termed DL-Recon) was proposed for improved intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) image quality.
methodsThe DL-Recon framework combines physics-based models with deep learning CT synthesis and leverages uncertainty information to promote robustness to unseen features. A 3D generative adversarial network (GAN) with a conditional loss function modulated by aleatoric uncertainty was developed for CBCT-to-CT synthesis. Epistemic uncertainty of the synthesis model was estimated via Monte Carlo (MC) dropout. Using spatially varying weights derived from epistemic uncertainty, the DL-Recon image combines the synthetic CT with an artifact-corrected filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction. In regions of high epistemic uncertainty, DL-Recon includes greater contribution from the FBP image. Twenty paired real CT and simulated CBCT images of the head were used for network training and validation, and experiments evaluated the performance of DL-Recon on CBCT images containing simulated and real brain lesions not present in the training data. Performance among learning- and physics-based methods was quantified in terms of structural similarity (SSIM) of the resulting image to diagnostic CT and Dice similarity metric (DSC) in lesion segmentation compared to ground truth. A pilot study was conducted involving seven subjects with CBCT images acquired during neurosurgery to assess the feasibility of DL-Recon in clinical data.
resultsCBCT images reconstructed via FBP with physics-based corrections exhibited the usual challenges to soft-tissue contrast resolution due to image non-uniformity, noise, and residual artifacts. GAN synthesis improved image uniformity and soft-tissue visibility but was subject to error in the shape and contrast of simulated lesions that were unseen in training. Incorporation of aleatoric uncertainty in synthesis loss improved estimation of epistemic uncertainty, with variable brain structures and unseen lesions exhibiting higher epistemic uncertainty. The DL-Recon approach mitigated synthesis errors while maintaining improvement in image quality, yielding 15%-22% increase in SSIM (image appearance compared to diagnostic CT) and up to 25% increase in DSC in lesion segmentation compared to FBP. Clear gains in visual image quality were also observed in real brain lesions and in clinical CBCT images.
conclusionsDL-Recon leveraged uncertainty estimation to combine the strengths of DL and physics-based reconstruction and demonstrated substantial improvements in the accuracy and quality of intraoperative CBCT. The improved soft-tissue contrast resolution could facilitate visualization of brain structures and support deformable registration with preoperative images, further extending the utility of intraoperative CBCT in image-guided neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.