Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36906915›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Combining physics-based models with deep learning image synthesis and uncertainty in intraoperative cone-beam CT of the brain.

Xiaoxuan Zhang, Alejandro Sisniega, Wojciech B Zbijewski, Junghoon Lee, Craig K Jones, Pengwei Wu, Runze Han, Ali Uneri, Prasad Vagdargi, Patrick A Helm and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoxuan ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Alejandro SisniegaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Wojciech B ZbijewskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Junghoon LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Craig K JonesDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pengwei WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Runze HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ali UneriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Prasad VagdargiDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Patrick A HelmMedtronic Plc., Littleton, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark LucianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
William S AndersonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey H SiewerdsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMedtronic (Ireland) · IE

Funding

Imaging, Guidance, and QA for Emerging High-Precision Neurosurgical TechniquesU01NS107133 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H, UNERI, ALI · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Medtronic Plc.NIH HHS U01 NS-107133NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS107133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage-guided neurosurgery requires high localization and registration accuracy to enable effective treatment and avoid complications. However, accurate neuronavigation based on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) or computed tomography (CT) images is challenged by brain deformation occurring during the surgical intervention. PURPOSE: To facilitate intraoperative visualization of brain tissues and deformable registration with preoperative images, a 3D deep learning (DL) reconstruction framework (termed DL-Recon) was proposed for improved intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) image quality.

methodsThe DL-Recon framework combines physics-based models with deep learning CT synthesis and leverages uncertainty information to promote robustness to unseen features. A 3D generative adversarial network (GAN) with a conditional loss function modulated by aleatoric uncertainty was developed for CBCT-to-CT synthesis. Epistemic uncertainty of the synthesis model was estimated via Monte Carlo (MC) dropout. Using spatially varying weights derived from epistemic uncertainty, the DL-Recon image combines the synthetic CT with an artifact-corrected filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction. In regions of high epistemic uncertainty, DL-Recon includes greater contribution from the FBP image. Twenty paired real CT and simulated CBCT images of the head were used for network training and validation, and experiments evaluated the performance of DL-Recon on CBCT images containing simulated and real brain lesions not present in the training data. Performance among learning- and physics-based methods was quantified in terms of structural similarity (SSIM) of the resulting image to diagnostic CT and Dice similarity metric (DSC) in lesion segmentation compared to ground truth. A pilot study was conducted involving seven subjects with CBCT images acquired during neurosurgery to assess the feasibility of DL-Recon in clinical data.

resultsCBCT images reconstructed via FBP with physics-based corrections exhibited the usual challenges to soft-tissue contrast resolution due to image non-uniformity, noise, and residual artifacts. GAN synthesis improved image uniformity and soft-tissue visibility but was subject to error in the shape and contrast of simulated lesions that were unseen in training. Incorporation of aleatoric uncertainty in synthesis loss improved estimation of epistemic uncertainty, with variable brain structures and unseen lesions exhibiting higher epistemic uncertainty. The DL-Recon approach mitigated synthesis errors while maintaining improvement in image quality, yielding 15%-22% increase in SSIM (image appearance compared to diagnostic CT) and up to 25% increase in DSC in lesion segmentation compared to FBP. Clear gains in visual image quality were also observed in real brain lesions and in clinical CBCT images.

conclusionsDL-Recon leveraged uncertainty estimation to combine the strengths of DL and physics-based reconstruction and demonstrated substantial improvements in the accuracy and quality of intraoperative CBCT. The improved soft-tissue contrast resolution could facilitate visualization of brain structures and support deformable registration with preoperative images, further extending the utility of intraoperative CBCT in image-guided neurosurgery.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsBrainCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPilot ProjectsUncertainty3D image reconstructionaleatoric uncertaintycone-beam CTdeep learningepistemic uncertaintygenerative adversarial networkimage-guided surgeryimage qualityimage synthesis

Identifiers

PMID36906915
PMCPMC10175241
OpenAlexW4323971770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.