ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2023
Intraovarian Injection of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Therapeutic Approaches in The Patients with Poor Ovarian Response: A before-after Study.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Outcome of IVF Cycle in Patients with Poor Ovarian Response.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Article
- Therapeutic roles of platelet-rich plasma to restore female reproductive and endocrine dysfunction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article published in Int J Fertil Steril, Vol 16, No 2, April-June 2022, Pages: 90-94, the authors found that this sentence "Also, AMH level was not statistically significantly different after PRP treatment (0.38 ± 0.039) in comparison with before of treatment (0.39 ± 0.04, Fig.1C)" was incorrect. The corrected one is "Also, AMH level was not significantly different before PRP treatment (0.38 ± 0.039) in comparison with after of treatment (0.39 ± 0.04, Fig.1C)" in the first paragraph of the result section.<br />The authors would like to apologies for any inconvenience caused.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.