Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36906657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A real-time prediction interval correction method with an unscented Kalman filter for settlement monitoring of a power station dam.

Ting Zhou, Yuxin Jie, Yingjie Wei, Yanyi Zhang, Hui Chen

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ting ZhouState Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China.
Yuxin JieState Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China.
Yingjie WeiSchool of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China. weiyingjie@cugb.edu.cn.
Yanyi ZhangChina Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, People's Republic of China.
Hui ChenChina Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, People's Republic of China.
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research · CNTsinghua University · CNChina University of Geosciences (Beijing) · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2652021016National Natural Science Foundation of China 52090081National Natural Science Foundation of China 52108372the Open Research Fund Program of State key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering sklhse-2023-D-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prediction interval (PI) method is developed to quantify the model uncertainty of embankment settlement prediction. Traditional PIs are constructed based on specific past period information and remain unchanged; hence, they neglect discrepancies between previous calculations and new monitoring data. In this paper, a real-time prediction interval correction method is proposed. Time-varying PIs are built by continuously incorporating new measurements into model uncertainty calculations. The method consists of trend identification, PI construction, and real-time correction. Primarily, trend identification is carried out by wavelet analysis to eliminate early unstable noise and determine the settlement trend. Then, the Delta method is applied to construct PIs based on the characterized trend, and a comprehensive evaluation index is introduced. The model output and the upper and lower bounds of the PIs are updated by the unscented Kalman filter (UKF). The effect of the UKF is compared with that of the Kalman filter (KF) and extended Kalman filter (EKF). The method was demonstrated in the Qingyuan power station dam. The results show that the time-varying PIs based on trend data are smoother than those based on original data with better evaluation index scores. Also, the PIs are not affected by local anomalies. The proposed PIs are consistent with the actual measurements, and the UKF performs better than the KF and EKF. The approach has the potential to provide more reliable embankment safety assessments.

Identifiers

PMID36906657
PMCPMC10008631
OpenAlexW4323971980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.