Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36906618›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Improving the robustness and stability of a machine learning model for breast cancer prognosis through the use of multi-modal classifiers.

Nikhilanand Arya, Sriparna Saha, Archana Mathur, Snehanshu Saha

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikhilanand AryaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, 801106, India. nikhilanand_1921cs24@iitp.ac.in.
Sriparna SahaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, 801106, India.
Archana MathurDepartment of Information Science & Engineering, Nitte Meenkashi Institute of Technology, Bangalore, 560064, India.
Snehanshu SahaAPPCAIR & CSIS, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani-Goa Campus, Pilani, Goa, 403726, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a deadly disease with a high mortality rate among PAN cancers. The advancements in biomedical information retrieval techniques have been beneficial in developing early prognosis and diagnosis systems for cancer patients. These systems provide the oncologist with plenty of information from several modalities to make the correct and feasible treatment plan for breast cancer patients and protect them from unnecessary therapies and their toxic side effects. The cancer patient's related information can be collected using various modalities like clinical, copy number variation, DNA-methylation, microRNA sequencing, gene expression, and histopathological whole slide images. High dimensionality and heterogeneity in these modalities demand the development of some intelligent systems to understand related features to the prognosis and diagnosis of diseases and make correct predictions. In this work, we have studied some end-to-end systems having two main components : (a) dimensionality reduction techniques applied to original features from different modalities and (b) classification techniques applied to the fusion of reduced feature vectors from different modalities for automatic predictions of breast cancer patients into two categories: short-time and long-time survivors. Principal component analysis (PCA) and variational auto-encoders (VAEs) are used as the dimensionality reduction techniques, followed by support vector machines (SVM) or random forest as the machine learning classifiers. The study utilizes raw, PCA, and VAE extracted features of the TCGA-BRCA dataset from six different modalities as input to the machine learning classifiers. We conclude this study by suggesting that adding more modalities to the classifiers provides complementary information to the classifier and increases the stability and robustness of the classifiers. In this study, the multimodal classifiers have not been validated on primary data prospectively.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreastDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansMachine LearningPrognosisSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID36906618
PMCPMC10008603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read89
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.