ArticleScientific reports2023
Improving the robustness and stability of a machine learning model for breast cancer prognosis through the use of multi-modal classifiers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential boundary tracking via reinforcement learning for overlapping cell resolution in sickle cell imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interpretable Whole-Breast Radiomic Biomarkers for Exploratory Assessment of HER2 + Breast Cancer in Digital Mammography.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Intelligent Attention-Driven Deep Learning for Hip Disease Diagnosis: Fusing Multimodal Imaging and Clinical Text for Enhanced Precision and Early Detection.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The role of AI for improved management of breast cancer: Enhanced diagnosis and health disparity mitigation.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2025Review
- A comparative analysis of parametric survival models and machine learning methods in breast cancer prognosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DeepTGIN: a novel hybrid multimodal approach using transformers and graph isomorphism networks for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Cross-attention enables deep learning on limited omics-imaging-clinical data of 130 lung cancer patients.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Article
- Histopathology in focus: a review on explainable multi-modal approaches for breast cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Deviation-support based fuzzy ensemble of multi-modal deep learning classifiers for breast cancer prognosis prediction.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Novel research and future prospects of artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Sickle cell disease classification using deep learning.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Breast cancer survival prognosis using the graph convolutional network with Choquet fuzzy integral.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a deadly disease with a high mortality rate among PAN cancers. The advancements in biomedical information retrieval techniques have been beneficial in developing early prognosis and diagnosis systems for cancer patients. These systems provide the oncologist with plenty of information from several modalities to make the correct and feasible treatment plan for breast cancer patients and protect them from unnecessary therapies and their toxic side effects. The cancer patient's related information can be collected using various modalities like clinical, copy number variation, DNA-methylation, microRNA sequencing, gene expression, and histopathological whole slide images. High dimensionality and heterogeneity in these modalities demand the development of some intelligent systems to understand related features to the prognosis and diagnosis of diseases and make correct predictions. In this work, we have studied some end-to-end systems having two main components : (a) dimensionality reduction techniques applied to original features from different modalities and (b) classification techniques applied to the fusion of reduced feature vectors from different modalities for automatic predictions of breast cancer patients into two categories: short-time and long-time survivors. Principal component analysis (PCA) and variational auto-encoders (VAEs) are used as the dimensionality reduction techniques, followed by support vector machines (SVM) or random forest as the machine learning classifiers. The study utilizes raw, PCA, and VAE extracted features of the TCGA-BRCA dataset from six different modalities as input to the machine learning classifiers. We conclude this study by suggesting that adding more modalities to the classifiers provides complementary information to the classifier and increases the stability and robustness of the classifiers. In this study, the multimodal classifiers have not been validated on primary data prospectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.