Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36906576›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2023

"The new normal has become a nonstop crisis": a qualitative study of burnout among Philadelphia's harm reduction and substance use disorder treatment workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ijeoma C Unachukwu, Matthew P Abrams, Abby Dolan, Kehinde Oyekemi, Zachary F Meisel, Eugenia C South, Shoshana V Aronowitz

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ijeoma C UnachukwuRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. iu21@rwjms.rutgers.edu.
Matthew P AbramsCenter for Emergency Care Policy and Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abby DolanCenter for Emergency Care Policy and Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kehinde OyekemiUrban Health Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zachary F MeiselCenter for Emergency Care Policy and Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eugenia C SouthUrban Health Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shoshana V AronowitzUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Studying the PhilAdelphia Resilience Project as a Response to Overdose (SPARRow)R01CE003143 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEISEL, ZACHARY FRANKLIN, SOUTH, EUGENIA C · 2019 to 2021
$2.3M
NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE003143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic worsened the ongoing overdose crisis in the United States (US) and caused significant mental health strain and burnout among health care workers (HCW). Harm reduction, overdose prevention, and substance use disorder (SUD) workers may be especially impacted due to underfunding, resources shortages, and chaotic working environments. Existing research on HCW burnout primarily focuses on licensed HCWs in traditional environments and fails to account for the unique experiences of harm reduction workers, community organizers, and SUD treatment clinicians.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative secondary analysis descriptive study of 30 Philadelphia-based harm reduction workers, community organizers, and SUD treatment clinicians about their experiences working in their roles during the COVID-19 pandemic in July-August 2020. Our analysis was guided by Shanafelt and Noseworthy's model of key drivers of burnout and engagement. We aimed to assess the applicability of this model to the experiences of SUD and harm reduction workers in non-traditional settings.

resultsWe deductively coded our data in alignment with Shanafelt and Noseworthy's key drivers of burnout and engagement: (1) workload and job demands, (2) meaning in work, (3) control and flexibility, (4) work-life integration, (5) organizational culture and values, (6) efficiency and resources and (7) social support and community at work. While Shanafelt and Noseworthy's model broadly encompassed the experiences of our participants, it did not fully account for their concerns about safety at work, lack of control over the work environment, and experiences of task-shifting.

conclusionsBurnout among healthcare providers is receiving increasing attention nationally. Much of this coverage and the existing research have focused on workers in traditional healthcare spaces and often do not consider the experiences of community-based SUD treatment, overdose prevention, and harm reduction providers. Our findings indicate a gap in existing frameworks for burnout and a need for models that encompass the full range of the harm reduction, overdose prevention, and SUD treatment workforce. As the US overdose crisis continues, it is vital that we address and mitigate experiences of burnout among harm reduction workers, community organizers, and SUD treatment clinicians to protect their wellbeing and to ensure the sustainability of their invaluable work.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Substance-Related DisordersHarm ReductionHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsPhiladelphia

Identifiers

PMID36906576
PMCPMC10008076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.