ArticleBMC women's health2023
Reusable period products: use and perceptions among young people in Victoria, Australia.
Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experiences, perceptions and barriers to use of reusable menstrual products among university students globally: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Menstrual product preference and factors associated with use of freely-distributed reusable products among secondary students in Uganda: a longitudinal study.BMC women's health · 2026Trial
- Developing a Community-Based Model for the Adoption of Sustainable Menstrual Products Among Adolescent Girls: Protocol for a 2-Phase Interventional Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- "Monthly Flower Blooms and Sheds off": Awareness, Hesitancy, and usage of Sustainable Menstrual Products among College Students of Pathanamthitta District, Kerala.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026Article
- Linking knowledge, belief and awareness of menstrual cycle with oral health in young India women.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Menstrual product use patterns in a large digital cohort in the United States: variations by sociodemographic, health, and menstrual characteristics.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Menstrual cup acceptability and functionality in real-world use: A cross-sectional survey of young people in Australia.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Menstrual products: culprits or bystanders in endometriosis and adenomyosis pathogenesis?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
- Review
- Study on the Permeability and Absorption Performance of the Crotch Layer in Seamless Knitted Period Underwear.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences about the Menstrual Cycle and Menstruation among Young Women: A Qualitative Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Systematic review of the effectiveness of menstrual health interventions in low- and middle-income countries in the East Asia and Pacific region.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Article
- Maintaining vulvar, vaginal and perineal health: Clinical considerations.Women's health (London, England)Review
- Measuring menstrual hygiene in high-income countries: A scoping review.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReusable menstrual products have expanded the choices available for menstrual care and can offer long-term cost and environmental benefits. Yet, in high-income settings, efforts to support period product access focus on disposable products. There is limited research to understand young people's product use and preferences in Australia.
methodsQuantitative and open-text qualitative data were collected through an annual cross-sectional survey of young people (aged 15-29) in Victoria, Australia. The convenience sample was recruited through targeted social media advertisements. Young people who reported menstruating in the past 6 months (n = 596) were asked questions about their menstrual product use, use of reusable materials, product priorities and preferences.
resultsAmong participants, 37% had used a reusable product during their last menstrual period (24% period underwear, 17% menstrual cup, 5% reusable pads), and a further 11% had tried using a reusable product in the past. Reusable product use was associated with older age (age 25-29 PR = 3.35 95%CI = 2.09-5.37), being born in Australia (PR = 1.74 95%CI = 1.05-2.87), and having greater discretionary income (PR = 1.53 95%CI = 1.01-2.32). Participants nominated comfort, protection from leakage and environmental sustainability as the most important features of menstrual products, followed by cost. Overall, 37% of participants reported not having enough information about reusable products. Having enough information was less common among younger participants (age 25-29 PR = 1.42 95%CI = 1.20-1.68) and high school students (PR = 0.68 95%CI = 0.52-0.88). Respondents highlighted the need for earlier and better information, challenges navigating the upfront cost and availability of reusables, positive experiences with reusables, and challenges for use, including cleaning reusables and changing them outside the home.
conclusionsMany young people are using reusable products, with environmental impacts an important motivator. Educators should incorporate better menstrual care information in puberty education and advocates should raise awareness of how bathroom facilities may support product choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.