Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36906521›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Comparison of the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided medial lumbar bundle branch block on pain related to lumbar facet joints: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority study.

Marie-Laure Nisolle, Djamal Ghoundiwal, Edgard Engelman, Walid El Founas, Jonathan Gouwy, Emmanuel Guntz, Panayota Kapessidou, Turgay Tuna

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Laure Nisolle *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. ml.nisolle@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3156-869X
Djamal Ghoundiwal *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Edgard EngelmanEW Data analysis, Brussels, Belgium.
Walid El FounasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue aux Laines 105, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Jonathan GouwyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Braine l'Alleud Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Wayez 35, 1420, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Emmanuel GuntzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Braine l'Alleud Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Wayez 35, 1420, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Panayota Kapessidou *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue aux Laines 105, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Turgay Tuna *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEStatistics Belgium · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this multicenter randomized interventional prospective study was to compare the ultrasound (US)-guided lumbar medial branch block (LMBB) with the fluoroscopy (FS)-guided LMBB in terms of analgesic efficacy and disability in the setting of the treatment of pain arising from the lumbar facet joints (LFJ).

methodsFifty adults with a "LFJ" syndrome were randomized into two groups: in group FS, fluoroscopic-guidance was used to block the medial branch at three lumbar levels (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1); in group US, same blocks were performed under ultrasound. Needle transverse approach was used with both techniques. Effects of these procedures were assessed with a Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAPS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Duke's Activity Status Index (DASI) scale, before the treatment, 1 week and 1 month after. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score was also collected before the procedure. Analysis of variance, one (for non-inferiority) and two-sided Mann-Whitney tests and Chi-square tests were performed.

resultsLMBB under US-guidance was not inferior to FS-guidance (P = 0.047) in terms of VAPS, ODI and DASI at 1 week and 1 month. Duration of techniques and HADS were similar between groups (=0.34; p = 0.59).

conclusionsThe medial lumbar bundle branch block under ultrasound-guidance is not inferior to the fluoroscopy-guidance procedure in effectively alleviating pain arising from the facet joints. Considering that this ultrasound technique has the benefit of an irradiation-free, real-time procedure, it can be considered as an effective alternative to the fluoroscopy-guided technique.

Indexed as

Low Back PainNerve BlockZygapophyseal JointAdultBundle-Branch BlockCardiac Conduction System DiseaseFluoroscopyHeart BlockHumansLumbar VertebraeProspective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalChronic painFluoroscopyLow-back painLumbar facet joint syndromeNerve blockUltrasonographyZygapophyseal joint

Identifiers

PMID36906521
PMCPMC10007783
OpenAlexW4323971904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.