ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
Multi-sweep 3-dimensional ultrasound is accurate for in vivo muscle volume quantification, expanding use to larger muscles.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geometry aware neural radiance fields for freehand ultrasound reconstruction.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2026Article
- Precise volume assessment for gastrocnemius muscles based on 3D ultrasound imaging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Volume Using 3D Ultrasonography: Validity and Reliability Compared to MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Muscle morphology and architecture of the medial gastrocnemius between typically developing children with different ancestral background.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle volume is an important parameter in analyzing three-dimensional structure of muscle-tendon units. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) enables excellent quantification of muscle volume in small muscles; however, when a muscle's cross sectional area is larger than the field of view of the ultrasound transducer at any point along its length, more than one sweep is necessary to reconstruct muscle anatomy. Confounding image registration errors have been reported between multiple sweeps. Here, we detail imaging phantom studies used to (1) define an acquisition protocol that reduces misalignment in 3D reconstruction caused by muscle deformation, and (2) quantify accuracy of 3DUS for measures of volume when phantoms are too large to be fully imaged via a single transducer sweep. Finally, we (3) establish the feasibility of our protocol for in vivo measures by comparing biceps brachii muscle volumes using 3DUS and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Phantom studies indicate operator intent to use constant pressure across multiple sweeps effectively mitigates image misalignment, yielding minimal volume error (1.70 ± 1.30%). Intentional application of different pressure between sweeps replicated discontinuity observed previously, leading to larger errors (5.30 ± 0.94%). Based on these findings, we adopted a gel bag standoff and acquired in vivo images of biceps brachii muscles using 3DUS and compared this volume to MRI. We did not observe misalignment errors and there were no significant differences between imaging modalities (-0.71 ± 5.03 %), indicating 3DUS can reliably be used to quantify muscle volume in larger muscles requiring multiple transducer sweeps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.