Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905701›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2023

What is the prevalence of developmental prosopagnosia? An empirical assessment of different diagnostic cutoffs.

Joseph DeGutis, Kanisha Bahierathan, Katherine Barahona, EunMyoung Lee, Travis C Evans, Hye Min Shin, Maruti Mishra, Jirapat Likitlersuang, Jeremy B Wilmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Social Interaction Anxiety in Developmental Prosopagnosia: Prevalence, Severity, and Individual Differences.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Face naming and recollection represent key memory deficits in developmental prosopagnosia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measure twice, cut once: Moving toward more inclusive, principled criteria for diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  19. Perceptual heterogeneity in developmental prosopagnosia is continuous, not categorical.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph DeGutisBoston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: degutis@wjh.harvard.edu.
Kanisha BahierathanBoston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine BarahonaBoston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
EunMyoung LeeBoston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Travis C EvansBoston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hye Min ShinBoston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Maruti MishraDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jirapat LikitlersuangBoston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeremy B WilmerDepartment of Psychology, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA.

Funding

Characterizing training-related neuroplasticity in developmental prosopagnosiaR01EY026057 · NEI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEGUTIS, JOSEPH MICHAEL · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
Developmental prosopagnosia subtypes: validation, neural mechanisms, and differential approaches to treatmentR01EY032510 · NEI · BOSTON VA RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI DEGUTIS, JOSEPH MICHAEL · 2022 to 2024
$1.2M
Characterizing and Remediating Recollection-specific Face Recognition Deficits in Developmental ProsopagnosiaR21EY031000 · NEI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEGUTIS, JOSEPH MICHAEL · 2020 to 2021
$355k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026057NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032510NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of developmental prosopagnosia (DP), lifelong face recognition deficits, is widely reported to be 2-2.5%. However, DP has been diagnosed in different ways across studies, resulting in differing prevalence rates. In the current investigation, we estimated the range of DP prevalence by administering well-validated objective and subjective face recognition measures to an unselected web-based sample of 3116 18-55 year-olds and applying DP diagnostic cutoffs from the last 14 years. We found estimated prevalence rates ranged from .64-5.42% when using a z-score approach and .13-2.95% when using a percentile approach, with the most commonly used cutoffs by researchers having a prevalence rate of .93% (z-score, .45% when using percentiles). We next used multiple cluster analyses to examine whether there was a natural grouping of poorer face recognizers but failed to find consistent grouping beyond those with generally above versus below average face recognition. Lastly, we investigated whether DP studies with more relaxed diagnostic cutoffs were associated with better performance on the Cambridge Face Perception Test. In a sample of 43 studies, there was a weak nonsignificant association between greater diagnostic strictness and better DP face perception accuracy (Kendall's tau-b correlation, τb =.18 z-score; τb = .11 percentiles). Together, these results suggest that researchers have used more conservative DP diagnostic cutoffs than the widely reported 2-2.5% prevalence. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of using more inclusive cutoffs, such as identifying mild and major forms of DP based on DSM-5.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionProsopagnosiaCluster AnalysisHumansPattern Recognition, VisualPrevalenceRecognition, PsychologyDevelopmental prosopagnosiaDiagnostic cutoffsFace recognitionPopulation prevalence

Identifiers

PMID36905701
PMCPMC10065901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.