Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905564›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2023

Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis.

Shunyi Fan, Yun Zhu, Changzhong Sui, Qian Li, Wenxin Jiang, Li Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RemimazolamPeerJ · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Clinical Application Study of Different Doses of Remimazolam Combined With Sevoflurane in Pediatric Adenoidectomy.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Remimazolam in anesthesia and sedation: A narrative review.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shunyi Fan *Service of Department of Anaesthesiology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China. shunyifan@outloook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-8464
Yun Zhu *The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Changzhong SuiThe Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Qian LiThe Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Wenxin JiangThe Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Li ZhangThe Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
First People's Hospital of Chongqing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPropofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or other procedures requiring short periods of sedation. This study aimed to establish whether remimazolam was effective and safe for inducing sedation for hysteroscopy.

methodsOne hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive induction with remimazolam or propofol. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam was administered. Propofol was started at 2-2.5 mg/kg. Before remimazolam or propofol induction, 1 μg/kg fentanyl was infused. Hemodynamic parameters, vital signs, and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured and adverse events recorded to evaluate safety. We comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the two drugs by the success rate of induction, fluctuation of vital signs, depth of anesthesia, adverse reactions, recovery time, and other indicators.

resultsInformation on 83 patients was successfully recorded and carefully documented. The success rate of sedation in the remimazolam group (group R) was 93%, which was lower than for the propofol group (group P) (100%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions in group R (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in group P (67.4%), and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The fluctuation of vital signs in group P was more severe after induction, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

conclusionsRemimazolam avoids the injection pain produced by propofol sedation, has a better pre-sedation experience, had the advantage of stable hemodynamics after injection compared to propofol, and a lower respiratory depression rate in the study patients.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepineHysteroscopyPropofolRemimazolamSafetySedation

Identifiers

PMID36905564
PMCPMC10199972
OpenAlexW4323920641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.