Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905519›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Optimized Nonviral Gene Disruption in Primary Murine and Human Myeloid Cells.

Emily C Freund, Simone M Haag, Benjamin Haley, Aditya Murthy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily C FreundDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. freund.emily@gene.com.
Simone M HaagDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Benjamin HaleyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aditya MurthyDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. aditya.murthy@gilead.com.
Gene Therapy Laboratory · FRPancreatic Cancer Action Network · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically engineered myeloid cells such as monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells have broad applications in basic and translational research. Their central roles in innate and adaptive immunity make them attractive as putative therapeutic cell products. However, efficient gene editing of primary myeloid cells presents unique challenges owing to their sensitivity to foreign nucleic acids and poor editing efficiencies using current methodologies (Hornung et al., Science 314:994-997, 2006; Coch et al., PLoS One 8:e71057, 2013; Bartok and Hartmann, Immunity 53:54-77, 2020; Hartmann, Adv Immunol 133:121-169, 2017; Bobadilla et al., Gene Ther 20:514-520, 2013; Schlee and Hartmann, Nat Rev Immunol 16:566-580, 2016; Leyva et al., BMC Biotechnol 11:13, 2011). This chapter describes nonviral CRISPR-mediated gene knockout in primary human and murine monocytes as well as monocyte-derived or bone marrow-derived macrophages and dendritic cells. Electroporation-mediated delivery of recombinant Cas9 complexed with synthetic guide RNAs can be applied for population-level disruption of single or multiple gene targets.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsElectroporationGenetic EngineeringHumansMacrophagesMiceBone marrowCas9Cell biologyCRISPRDendritic cellsElectroporationGene editingGenetic engineeringHumanImmunologyInnate immunityKnockoutMacrophagesMonocytesMouseMurineMyeloid cellsRNP

Identifiers

PMID36905519
OpenAlexW4323920629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.