Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905493›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2023

Non-mass lesions on breast ultrasound: why does not the ACR BI-RADS breast ultrasound lexicon add the terminology?

Takayoshi Uematsu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Approach to Nonmass Lesions on Breast Ultrasound.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Takayoshi UematsuDepartment of Breast Imaging and Breast Intervention Radiology, Department of Clinical Physiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Japan. t.uematsu@scchr.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4462-7430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition of a non-mass lesion on breast ultrasound (US) is designed for everyday practice to provide unambiguous clinical management and to assist physicians and sonographers as they interpret breast US images. The field of breast imaging research requires consistent and standardized terminology for non-mass lesions identified on breast US, especially when differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Physicians and sonographers should be aware of the benefits and limitations of the terminology and use them precisely. I am hopeful that the next edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon will include standardized terminology for describing non-mass lesions detected on breast US.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUltrasonography, MammaryFemaleHumansUltrasonographyBI-RADSBreastMRINon-massUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36905493
PMCPMC10354162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.