Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905468›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Discordance between 2D and 4D flow in the assessment of pulmonary regurgitation severity: a right ventricular remodeling follow-up study.

Gilles Soulat, Yousef Alattar, Magalie Ladouceur, Damian Craiem, Ariel Pascaner, Umit Gencer, Sophie Malekzadeh-Milani, Laurence Iserin, Clement Karsenty, Elie Mousseaux

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gilles SoulatUniversité Paris cité, PARCC (Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center), INSERM 970, 20 rue Leblanc, F-75015, Paris, France. gilles.soulat@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-6113
Yousef AlattarAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, F-75015, Paris, France.
Magalie LadouceurUniversité Paris cité, PARCC (Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center), INSERM 970, 20 rue Leblanc, F-75015, Paris, France.
Damian CraiemInstituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMeTTyB), Universidad Favaloro-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ariel PascanerInstituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMeTTyB), Universidad Favaloro-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Umit GencerAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, F-75015, Paris, France.
Sophie Malekzadeh-MilaniAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, F-75015, Paris, France.
Laurence IserinAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, F-75015, Paris, France.
Clement KarsentyUniversité Paris cité, PARCC (Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center), INSERM 970, 20 rue Leblanc, F-75015, Paris, France.
Elie MousseauxUniversité Paris cité, PARCC (Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center), INSERM 970, 20 rue Leblanc, F-75015, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPulmonary regurgitation (PR) is common in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). 2D phase contrast MRI is the reference method for the quantification of PR and helps in the decision of pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). 4D flow MRI can be an alternative method to estimate PR but more validation is still needed. Our purpose was to compare 2D and 4D flow in PR quantification using the degree of right ventricular remodeling after PVR as the reference standard.

methodsIn 30 adult patients with a pulmonary valve disease recruited between 2015 and 2018, PR was assessed using both 2D and 4D flow. Based on the clinical standard of care, 22 underwent PVR. The pre PVR estimate of PR was compared using the post-operative decrease in right ventricle end-diastolic volume on follow-up exam as reference.

resultsIn the overall cohort, regurgitant volume (Rvol) and regurgitant fraction (RF) of PR measured by 2D and 4D flow were well correlated but with moderate agreement in the overall cohort (r = 0.90, mean diff.  -14 ± 12.5 mL; and r = 0.72, mean diff.  -15 ± 13%; all p < 0.0001). Correlations between Rvol estimates and right ventricle end-diastolic volume decrease after PVR was higher with 4D flow (r = 0.80, p < 0.0001) than with 2D flow (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001).

conclusionsIn ACHD, PR quantification from 4D flow better predicts post-PVR right ventricle remodeling than that from 2D flow. Further studies are needed to evaluate the added value of this 4D flow quantification for guiding replacement decision. KEY POINTS: • Using 4D flow MRI allows a better quantification of pulmonary regurgitation in adult congenital heart disease than 2D flow when taking right ventricle remodeling after pulmonary valve replacement as a reference. • A plane positioned perpendicular to the ejected flow volume as allowed by 4D flow provides better results to estimate pulmonary regurgitation.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalPulmonary ValvePulmonary Valve InsufficiencyTetralogy of FallotAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingVentricular Function, RightVentricular RemodelingHeart defects, CongenitalMagnetic resonance imagingTetralogy of Fallot

Identifiers

PMID36905468
OpenAlexW4323921185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.