Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905463›Full record

ArticleMolecular biotechnology2024

Traversing DNA-Protein Interactions Between Mesophilic and Thermophilic Bacteria: Implications from Their Cold Shock Response.

Alankar Roy, Sujay Ray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alankar RoyAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata, India.
Sujay RayAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata, India. raysujay@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-6794
Amity University · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cold shock proteins (CSPs) are small, acidic proteins which contain a conserved nucleic acid-binding domain. These perform mRNA translation acting as "RNA chaperones" when triggered by low temperatures initiating their cold shock response. CSP- RNA interactions have been predominantly studied. Our focus will be CSP-DNA interaction examination, to analyse the diverse interaction patterns such as electrostatic, hydrogen and hydrophobic bonding in both thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria. The differences in the molecular mechanism of these contrasting bacterial proteins are studied. Computational techniques such as modelling, energy refinement, simulation and docking were operated to obtain data for comparative analysis. The thermostability factors which stabilise a thermophilic bacterium and their effect on their molecular regulation is investigated. Conformational deviation, atomic residual fluctuations, binding affinity, Electrostatic energy and Solvent Accessibility energy were determined during stimulation along with their conformational study. The study revealed that mesophilic bacteria E. coli CSP have higher binding affinity to DNA than thermophilic G. stearothermophilus. This was further evident by low conformation deviation and atomic fluctuations during simulation.

Indexed as

Cold Shock Proteins and PeptidesCold-Shock ResponseEscherichia coliProtein BindingBacterial ProteinsCold TemperatureDNADNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsGeobacillus stearothermophilusHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationStatic ElectricityBacterial ProteinsCold Shock Proteins and PeptidesDNADNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsBinding AffinityCold Shock ResponseCSPDNA-Binding SitesElectrostatic Surface PotentialMutation

Identifiers

PMID36905463
OpenAlexW4323920912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.