Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905435›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2024

Evidence-based Recovery Colleges: developing a typology based on organisational characteristics, fidelity and funding.

Daniel Hayes, Elizabeth M Camacho, Amy Ronaldson, Katy Stepanian, Merly McPhilbin, Rachel A Elliott, Julie Repper, Simon Bishop, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa Brophy and 8 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Are We There Yet? Co-Production in Recovery Colleges.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Daniel Hayes *Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. d.hayes@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4948-3333
Elizabeth M Camacho *Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-7710
Amy RonaldsonHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-9168
Katy StepanianHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8460-1433
Merly McPhilbinSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-3829
Rachel A ElliottDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3650-0168
Julie RepperImROC, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Mapperley, Nottingham, NG3 6AA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7020-3415
Simon BishopNottingham University Business School, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8527-7081
Vicky StergiopoulosCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-9434
Lisa BrophySchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-3490
Kirsty GilesSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
Sarah TrickettRECOLLECT Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-2469
Stella LawrenceRECOLLECT Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-5952
Gary WinshipSchool of Education, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG2 5BY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6336-3317
Sara MeddingsImROC, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Mapperley, Nottingham, NG3 6AA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-876X
Ioannis BakolisHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4800-1630
Claire Henderson *Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6998-5659
Mike Slade *School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-3434

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecovery Colleges (RCs) have been implemented across England with wide variation in organisational characteristics. The purpose of this study is to describe RCs across England in terms of organisational and student characteristics, fidelity and annual spending, to generate a RC typology based on characteristics and to explore the relationship between characteristics and fidelity.

methodsAll RC in England meeting criteria on recovery orientation, coproduction and adult learning were included. Managers completed a survey capturing characteristics, fidelity and budget. Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to identify common groupings and generate an RC typology.

resultsParticipants comprised 63 (72%) of 88 RC in England. Fidelity scores were high (median 11, IQR 9-13). Both NHS and strengths-focussed RCs were associated with higher fidelity. The median annual budget was £200,000 (IQR £127,000-£300,000) per RC. The median cost per student was £518 (IQR £275-£840), cost per course designed was £5,556 (IQR £3,000-£9,416) and per course run was £1,510 (IQR £682-£3,030). The total annual budget across England for RCs is an estimated £17.6 m including £13.4 m from NHS budgets, with 11,000 courses delivered to 45,500 students.

conclusionAlthough the majority of RCs had high levels of fidelity, there were sufficiently pronounced differences in other key characteristics to generate a typology of RCs. This typology might prove important for understanding student outcomes and how they are achieved and for commissioning decisions. Staffing and co-producing new courses are key drivers of spending. The estimated budget for RCs was less than 1% of NHS mental health spending.

Indexed as

State MedicineAdultBudgetsEnglandEvidence-Based PracticeHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesEnglandManagersMental health servicesRecovery CollegeService costsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36905435
PMCPMC10007645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read27
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.