Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905411›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

PSMA-PET/CT-guided salvage radiotherapy in recurrent or persistent prostate cancer and PSA < 0.2 ng/ml.

Nantia Solomonidou, Daphnie Germanou, Iosif Strouthos, Efstratios Karagiannis, Andrea Farolfi, Stefan A Koerber, Juergen Debus, Jan C Peeken, Marco E Vogel, Alexis Vrachimis and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Superiority of long axial field-of-viewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Molecular Imaging in Photon Radiotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Phase 1 Trial of Image Guided Risk Volume-Adapted Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Article
  10. The superior detection rate of total-body [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Nantia Solomonidou *Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
Daphnie Germanou *Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
Iosif StrouthosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
Efstratios KaragiannisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
Andrea FarolfiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefan A KoerberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Juergen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan C PeekenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Marco E VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Alexis VrachimisDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
Simon K B SpohnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Mohamed ShelanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anca-Ligia GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Francesco CeciDivision of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stephanie G C KroezeNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Matthias GuckenbergerNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stefano FantiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
George HrubyNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
S ScharlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas WiegelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph HenkenberensDepartment of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Louise EmmettDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Nina Sophie Schmidt-HegemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Konstantinos Ferentinos *Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
Constantinos Zamboglou *Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. constantinos.zamboglou@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7849-7550
LMU Klinikum · DEThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Freiburg · DEAzienda USL di Bologna · ITGerman Cancer Research Center · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Bern · CHMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Milan · ITUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this retrospective, multicenter study was to assess efficacy of PSMA-PET/CT-guided salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in patients with recurrent or persistent PSA after primary surgery and PSA levels < 0.2 ng/ml.

methodsThe study included patients from a pooled cohort (n = 1223) of 11 centers from 6 countries. Patients with PSA levels > 0.2 ng/ml prior to sRT or without sRT to the prostatic fossa were excluded. The primary study endpoint was biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and BR was defined as PSA nadir after sRT + 0.2 ng/ml. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of clinical parameters on BRFS. Recurrence patterns after sRT were analyzed.

resultsThe final cohort consisted of 273 patients; 78/273 (28.6%) and 48/273 (17.6%) patients had local or nodal recurrence on PET/CT. The most frequently applied sRT dose to the prostatic fossa was 66-70 Gy (n = 143/273, 52.4%). SRT to pelvic lymphatics was delivered in 87/273 (31.9%) patients and androgen deprivation therapy was given to 36/273 (13.2%) patients. After a median follow-up time of 31.1 months (IQR: 20-44), 60/273 (22%) patients had biochemical recurrence. The 2- and 3-year BRFS was 90.1% and 79.2%, respectively. The presence of seminal vesicle invasion in surgery (p = 0.019) and local recurrences in PET/CT (p = 0.039) had a significant impact on BR in multivariate analysis. In 16 patients, information on recurrence patterns on PSMA-PET/CT after sRT was available and one had recurrent disease inside the RT field.

conclusionThis multicenter analysis suggests that implementation of PSMA-PET/CT imaging for sRT guidance might be of benefit for patients with very low PSA levels after surgery due to promising BRFS rates and a low number of relapses within the sRT field.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyAndrogen AntagonistsGallium RadioisotopesProstate-Specific AntigenProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenPSMA-PETSalvage radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36905411
PMCPMC10250454
OpenAlexW4323921037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.