Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905406›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2023

The role of objecthood and animacy in apparent movement processing.

Emiel Cracco, Tilia Linthout, Guido Orgs

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Emiel CraccoDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4043-5992
Tilia LinthoutDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Guido OrgsDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London SE14 6NW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-3979
Ghent University Hospital · BEMax Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the ability to detect the actions of other living beings is key for adaptive social behavior, it is still unclear if biological motion perception is specific to human stimuli. Biological motion perception involves both bottom-up processing of movement kinematics ('motion pathway') and top-down reconstruction of movement from changes in the body posture ('form pathway'). Previous research using point-light displays has shown that processing in the motion pathway depends on the presence of a well-defined, configural shape (objecthood) but not necessarily on whether that shape depicts a living being (animacy). Here, we focused on the form pathway. Specifically, we combined electroencephalography (EEG) frequency tagging with apparent motion to study how objecthood and animacy influence posture processing and the integration of postures into movements. By measuring brain responses to repeating sequences of well-defined or pixelated images (objecthood), depicting human or corkscrew agents (animacy), performing either fluent or non-fluent movements (movement fluency), we found that movement processing was sensitive to objecthood but not animacy. In contrast, posture processing was sensitive to both. Together, these results indicate that reconstructing biological movements from apparent motion sequences requires a well-defined but not necessarily an animate shape. Instead, stimulus animacy appears to be relevant only for posture processing.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionMovementHumansPhotic StimulationPostureSocial Behavioranimacyapparent movement processingbiological motion perceptionfrequency taggingobjecthood

Identifiers

PMID36905406
PMCPMC10032357
OpenAlexW4323920650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read27
reference markers read7
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.